Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32469987›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Prognostic value of LAT-1 status in solid cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jing-Jing Lu, Ping Li, Yong Yang, Le Wang, Yan Zhang, Jia-Yao Zhu, Xiao-Ren Zhu, Min-Bin Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prognostic assessment ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  12. [Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing-Jing LuDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Ping LiDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Yong YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Le WangDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Jia-Yao ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Xiao-Ren ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Min-Bin ChenDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1453-8664
Jiangsu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe expression of the L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) plays a significant role in tumor progression. However, it remains unclear whether high LAT1 expression correlates with poor prognosis of solid tumor patients. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the potential of LAT1 in predicting the prognosis of tumor patients. METHODS AND

findingsA total of 4,579 cases were analyzed from 35 qualified studies. In patients with solid tumors, elevated expression of LAT1 is associated with poor prognosis (overall survival [OS]: pooled hazard ratio (HR) = 1.848, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.620-2.108, P < 0.001; disease free survival [DFS]: pooled HR = 1.923, 95% CI = 1.585-2.333, P < 0.001; progression free survival [PFS]: pooled HR = 1.345, 95% CI = 1.133-1.597, P = 0.001). Furthermore, in subgroup analysis, we found an association between high LAT1 expression and poor OS in non-small cell lung cancer (HR = 1.554, 95% CI = 1.345-1.794, P < 0.001), pancreatic cancer (HR = 2.052, 95% CI = 1.613-2.724, P < 0.001) and biliary tract cancer (HR = 2.253, 95% CI = 1.562-3.227, P < 0.001).

conclusionThe results of this meta-analysis indicate the reliability and potential of using LAT1 expression as a predictive biomarker in solid cancers prior to treatment. However, further studies with larger sample sizes would be beneficial for fully evaluating the predictive value of LAT1 expression for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansLarge Neutral Amino Acid-Transporter 1Lung NeoplasmsNeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorLarge Neutral Amino Acid-Transporter 1SLC7A5 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32469987
PMCPMC7259771
OpenAlexW3029005918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.