Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32469953›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Differentiating between spinal schwannomas and meningiomas using MRI: A focus on cystic change.

Ji Hyun Lee, Hyun Su Kim, Young Cheol Yoon, Min Jae Cha, Sun-Ho Lee, Eun-Sang Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spinal schwannoma: Limitations of CT imaging.Radiology case reports · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ji Hyun LeeDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8582-5436
Hyun Su KimDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0179-9542
Young Cheol YoonDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Min Jae ChaDepartment of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sun-Ho LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Eun-Sang KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRChung-Ang University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo retrospectively determine the diagnostic ability of MRI in differentiating between intradural extramedullary spinal schwannomas and meningiomas.

methodsA total of 199 patients with spinal intradural extramedullary tumors who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI between January 2012 and December 2018 were included in this study. Two radiologists independently analyzed the presence of cystic change, dural tail sign, and neural foraminal extension. Clinical and MRI features between the two groups were compared by univariable and multivariable analyses using logistic regression. Interobserver agreements were calculated using kappa statistics.

resultsPatients with schwannoma showed significantly higher frequency of cystic change (96% vs 24%, P < 0.001), neural foraminal extension (29% vs 3%, P = 0.001), and lumbar location (41% vs 5%, P = 0.008). Patients with meningioma showed significantly higher frequency of dural tail sign (64% vs 1%, P < 0.001), thoracic location (75% vs 31%, P = 0.007), older age (59.7 years vs 47.6 years, P < 0.001), higher female predominance (83% vs 50%, P < 0.001), and smaller size (19.8 cm vs 28.8 cm, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that cystic change (P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 0.02), dural tail sign (P < 0.001; OR, 36.23), age (P = 0.032; OR, 1.06), and lumbar location (P = 0.006; OR, 0.02) were independent factors. Interobserver agreements were almost perfect for all analyses.

conclusionsMRI features were useful in differentiating between intradural extramedullary schwannomas from meningiomas. The presence of cystic change and dural tail sign were independently significant discriminators.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedNeurilemmomaRetrospective StudiesSchwann CellsSpinal NeoplasmsSpine

Identifiers

PMID32469953
PMCPMC7259580
OpenAlexW3029385710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.