Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32469942›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Trends in tobacco, alcohol and branded fast-food imagery in Bollywood films, 1994-2013.

Ailsa J McKay, Nalin Singh Negi, Nandita Murukutla, Anthony A Laverty, Pallavi Puri, Bella Vasant Uttekar, Sandra Mullin, Christopher Millett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ailsa J McKayDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nalin Singh NegiVital Strategies, New York, New York, United States of America.
Nandita MurukutlaVital Strategies, New York, New York, United States of America.
Anthony A LavertyPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1318-8439
Pallavi PuriVital Strategies, New York, New York, United States of America.
Bella Vasant UttekarCentre for Operations Research and Training, Vadodara, India.
Sandra MullinVital Strategies, New York, New York, United States of America.
Christopher MillettPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsExposure to tobacco, alcohol and fast-food use in films is associated with initiation of these behaviours. India is the world's largest film producer, but the extent of such imagery in Bollywood (Hindi cinema) films is unclear. We therefore aimed to describe the extent of and trends in tobacco, alcohol and fast-food imagery in Bollywood films, between 1994-2013.

methodsFor the 15 top-grossing films each year between 1994-2013, the number of five-minute intervals containing product images were determined separately for tobacco, alcohol and fast-food. Both the proportion of films containing at least one image occurrence, and occurrences per film, were described overall and by year. Negative binomial regression described associations between film rating and occurrences/film, and estimated time-trends in occurrences/film, adjusted for rating.

resultsWe analysed 93 U-rated (unrestricted), 150 U/A-rated (parental guidance for children aged <12 years) and 55 A-rated (restricted to adult audience) films, containing 9,226 five-minute intervals (mean intervals/film 30.8, SD 4.0). 70% (n = 210), 93% (n = 278) and 21% (n = 62) of films contained at least one tobacco, alcohol and fast-food occurrence, respectively. Corresponding total mean occurrences/film were 4.0 (SD 4.9), 7.0 (4.7) and 0.4 (0.9). Tobacco occurrences were more common in U/A films (incidence rate ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.09) and A films (2.95; 1.95-4.48) than U-rated films. Alcohol occurrences were also more common in A-rated films than U-rated films (1.48; 1.15-1.85). Tobacco occurrences/film became less common over the observed period (adjusted trend -4% per annum; -2 to -7%; p <0.001), while alcohol (+2%; 0-3%; p = 0.02), and fast food (+8%; 2-14%; p = 0.01) occurrences/film became more common.

conclusionsAlthough the extent of tobacco imagery in Bollywood films fell over 1994-2013, it is still frequently observed. Alcohol imagery is widespread, even in U-rated films, and trends in both alcohol and fast-food imagery are upwards.

Indexed as

Mass MediaAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingChildFast FoodsFemaleHumansImagery, PsychotherapyIndiaMaleMotion PicturesSmokingViolence

Identifiers

PMID32469942
PMCPMC7259671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.