Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32469924›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Application of explainable ensemble artificial intelligence model to categorization of hemodialysis-patient and treatment using nationwide-real-world data in Japan.

Eiichiro Kanda, Bogdan I Epureanu, Taiji Adachi, Yuki Tsuruta, Kan Kikuchi, Naoki Kashihara, Masanori Abe, Ikuto Masakane, Kosaku Nitta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eiichiro KandaMedical Science, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0676-096X
Bogdan I EpureanuCollege of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Taiji AdachiInstitute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuki TsurutaTsuruta Itabashi Clinic, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.
Kan KikuchiShimoochiai Clinic, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki KashiharaDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Masanori AbeDivision of Nephrology, Hypertension and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9156-5415
Ikuto MasakaneDepartment of Nephrology, Yabuki Hospital, Yamagata, Yamagata, Japan.
Kosaku NittaDepartment of Nephrology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough dialysis patients are at a high risk of death, it is difficult for medical practitioners to simultaneously evaluate many inter-related risk factors. In this study, we evaluated the characteristics of hemodialysis patients using machine learning model, and its usefulness for screening hemodialysis patients at a high risk of one-year death using the nation-wide database of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe patients were separated into two datasets (n = 39,930, 39,930, respectively). We categorized hemodialysis patients in Japan into new clusters generated by the K-means clustering method using the development dataset. The association between a cluster and the risk of death was evaluated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Then, we developed an ensemble model composed of the clusters and support vector machine models in the model development phase, and compared the accuracy of the prediction of mortality between the machine learning models in the model validation phase.

resultsAverage age of the subjects was 65.7±12.2 years; 32.7% had diabetes mellitus. The five clusters clearly distinguished the groups on the basis of their characteristics: Cluster 1, young male, and chronic glomerulonephritis; Cluster 2, female, and chronic glomerulonephritis; Cluster 3, diabetes mellitus; Cluster 4, elderly and nephrosclerosis; Cluster 5, elderly and protein energy wasting. These clusters were associated with the risk of death; Cluster 5 compared with Cluster 1, hazard ratio 8.86 (95% CI 7.68, 10.21). The accuracy of the ensemble model for the prediction of 1-year death was 0.948 and higher than those of logistic regression model (0.938), support vector machine model (0.937), and deep learning model (0.936).

conclusionsThe clusters clearly categorized patient on their characteristics, and reflected their prognosis. Our real-world-data-based machine learning system is applicable to identifying high-risk hemodialysis patients in clinical settings, and has a strong potential to guide treatments and improve their prognosis.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCluster AnalysisCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDecision Making, Computer-AssistedDeep LearningFemaleHumansJapanKidney Failure, ChronicLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMale

Identifiers

PMID32469924
PMCPMC7259704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.