Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32469907›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic-associated adverse events in children-A scoping review to inform development of a core outcome set.

Jan Łukasik, Qin Guo, Leah Boulos, Hania Szajewska, Bradley C Johnston

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06283784 (Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study To Evaluate The Efficacy of a Proprietary Mix of Live Probiotics in the Prophylaxis Of Diarrhea In Adult Patients Who Already Initiated An Oral Antibiotic Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06283784 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study To Evaluate The Efficacy of a Proprietary Mix of Live Probiotics in the Prophylaxis Of Diarrhea In Adult Patients Who Already Initiated An Oral Antibiotic Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiofarmaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsDiarrheaArmsYovis Capsules, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jan ŁukasikDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9385-857X
Qin GuoDepartment of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Leah BoulosMaritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Halifax, Canada.
Hania SzajewskaDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Bradley C JohnstonDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLDalhousie University · CASichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRoutine use of probiotics during antibiotic therapy in children remains a subject of discussion. To facilitate synthesis of individual study results and guideline formulation, it is important to assess predefined, similar, and clinically important outcomes. Core outcome sets are a proposed solution for this issue. The aim of this review was to document choice, design, and heterogeneity of outcomes in studies that assessed the effects of probiotics used for the prevention of antibiotic-associated adverse events in children.

methodsA scoping literature search covering three major databases was performed. Studies that evaluated oral probiotics' use concomitant with antibiotic therapy in children were included. Data on outcome definitions, measurement instruments, and follow-up were extracted. The outcomes were assigned to predefined core areas and domains. Data were analyzed descriptively.

resultsThirty-seven studies were included in this review. Diarrhea, the most commonly reported outcome, had diagnostic criteria clearly defined only in 21 studies. In total, 16 different definitions of diarrhea were identified. Diarrhea duration, severity, and etiology were reported in 9, 4, and 7 studies, respectively. Twenty studies assessed gastrointestinal symptoms other than diarrhea. Seven studies reported outcomes related to resource use or the economic impact of the intervention. Only 2 studies assessed outcomes related to life impact. None of the studies predefined adverse events of probiotic use.

conclusionsIdentified outcomes were characterized by substantial heterogeneity. The majority of outcomes were not designed to evaluate endpoints of real-life relevance. Results from this review suggest the need for a new core outcome set consisting of outcomes important for decision-making.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualDiarrheaDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansProbioticsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID32469907
PMCPMC7259577
OpenAlexW3032007732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.