Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32469898›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Diversity in Chlamydial plasmids.

Kolos V Szabo, Colette E O'Neill, Ian N Clarke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Epidemiology and Genetic Diversity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  5. Chlamydiosis in Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. The serodiagnositic value ofFrontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome organization and genomics inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Chlamydiae - What's New?Journal of veterinary research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kolos V SzaboFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4169-127X
Colette E O'NeillMolecular Microbiology Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Ian N ClarkeMolecular Microbiology Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvolutionary studies have been conducted that have investigated the chromosomal variance in the genus of Chlamydia. However, no all-encompassing genus-wide comparison has been performed on the plasmid. Therefore, there is a gap in the current knowledge on Chlamydia plasmid diversity.

aimsThis project is aimed to investigate and establish the nature and extent of diversity across the entire genus of Chlamydia, by comparing the sequences of all currently available plasmid carrying strains.

methodsThe PUBMED database was used to identify plasmid sequences from all available strains that met the set quality criteria for their inclusion in the study. Alignments were performed on the 51 strains that fulfilled the criteria using MEGA X software. Following that Maximum Likelihood estimation was used to construct 11 phylogenetic trees of the whole plasmid sequence, the individual 8 coding sequences, the iteron and a chromosomal gene ompA as a comparator.

resultsThe genus-wide plasmid phylogeny produced three distinct lineages labelled as alpha, beta and gamma. Nineteen genotypes were found in the initial whole plasmid analysis. Their distribution was allocated as six C. pecorum, two C. pneumoniae, one C. gallinacea, one C. avium, one C. caviae, one C. felis, two C. psittaci, one C. trachomatis, one C. muridarum, and two C. suis. The chromosomal comparative gene ompA supported this distribution, with the same number of primary clades with the same species distribution. However, ompA sequence comparison resulted in fewer genotypes due to a reduced amount of available sequences (33 out of 51). All results were statistically significant.

conclusionThe results of this study indicate that the common bacterial ancestor of all the species had a plasmid, which has diverged over time. Moreover, it suggests that there is a strong evolutionary selection towards these species retaining their plasmids due to its high level of conservation across the genus, with the notable exception of C. pneumoniae. Furthermore, the evolutionary analysis showed that the plasmid and the chromosome have co-evolved.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsChlamydiaChlamydia InfectionsGenome, BacterialGenotypePhylogenyPlasmidsSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID32469898
PMCPMC7259575
OpenAlexW3031739360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.