Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32469840›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Natural Language Processing for Surveillance of Cervical and Anal Cancer and Precancer: Algorithm Development and Split-Validation Study.

Carlos R Oliveira, Patrick Niccolai, Anette Michelle Ortiz, Sangini S Sheth, Eugene D Shapiro, Linda M Niccolai, Cynthia A Brandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlos R OliveiraDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1897-6581
Patrick NiccolaiDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4047-1635
Anette Michelle OrtizDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7609-5689
Sangini S ShethDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3154-9624
Eugene D ShapiroDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4130-3468
Linda M NiccolaiDepartments of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2969-3157
Cynthia A BrandtDepartments of Emergency Medicine, Biostatistics, and Health Informatics, Yale Schools of Medicine and Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8179-1796

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale University Clinical and Translational Science Award ProgramUL1TR000142 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2012 to 2015
$31.8M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001862 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LLOYD G, EDELMAN, E. JENNIFER · 2016 to 2025
$12.2M
Research Training in Pediatric Infectious DiseasesT32AI007210 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MURRAY, THOMAS SCOT, SHAPIRO, EUGENE DAVID · 1986 to 2023
$2.6M
Effectiveness of HPV Vaccine by Age at Immunization as Used in Clinical PracticeR01AI123204 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NICCOLAI, LINDA M · 2017 to 2020
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001862NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000142NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123204NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate identification of new diagnoses of human papillomavirus-associated cancers and precancers is an important step toward the development of strategies that optimize the use of human papillomavirus vaccines. The diagnosis of human papillomavirus cancers hinges on a histopathologic report, which is typically stored in electronic medical records as free-form, or unstructured, narrative text. Previous efforts to perform surveillance for human papillomavirus cancers have relied on the manual review of pathology reports to extract diagnostic information, a process that is both labor- and resource-intensive. Natural language processing can be used to automate the structuring and extraction of clinical data from unstructured narrative text in medical records and may provide a practical and effective method for identifying patients with vaccine-preventable human papillomavirus disease for surveillance and research.

objectiveThis study's objective was to develop and assess the accuracy of a natural language processing algorithm for the identification of individuals with cancer or precancer of the cervix and anus.

methodsA pipeline-based natural language processing algorithm was developed, which incorporated machine learning and rule-based methods to extract diagnostic elements from the narrative pathology reports. To test the algorithm's classification accuracy, we used a split-validation study design. Full-length cervical and anal pathology reports were randomly selected from 4 clinical pathology laboratories. Two study team members, blinded to the classifications produced by the natural language processing algorithm, manually and independently reviewed all reports and classified them at the document level according to 2 domains (diagnosis and human papillomavirus testing results). Using the manual review as the gold standard, the algorithm's performance was evaluated using standard measurements of accuracy, recall, precision, and F-measure.

resultsThe natural language processing algorithm's performance was validated on 949 pathology reports. The algorithm demonstrated accurate identification of abnormal cytology, histology, and positive human papillomavirus tests with accuracies greater than 0.91. Precision was lowest for anal histology reports (0.87, 95% CI 0.59-0.98) and highest for cervical cytology (0.98, 95% CI 0.95-0.99). The natural language processing algorithm missed 2 out of the 15 abnormal anal histology reports, which led to a relatively low recall (0.68, 95% CI 0.43-0.87).

conclusionsThis study outlines the development and validation of a freely available and easily implementable natural language processing algorithm that can automate the extraction and classification of clinical data from cervical and anal cytology and histology.

Indexed as

accuracyanal cancerautomated data extractioncancercervical cancerHPVhuman papillomavirusnatural language processingpathology reportingprecancersurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32469840
PMCPMC7671846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.