Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32469442›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2020

A pilot study of optical neuronavigation-guided brain biopsy in the horse using anatomic landmarks and fiducial arrays for patient registration.

Lawrence Santistevan, Jeremiah Easley, Audrey Ruple, Sam Monck, Elissa Randall, Fred Wininger, Rebecca A Packer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lawrence SantistevanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Jeremiah EasleyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Audrey RupleDepartment of Public Health, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Sam MonckDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Elissa RandallDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Fred WiningerCharlotte Animal Referral and Emergency, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Rebecca A PackerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0227-4131
Colorado State University · USCharlotte School of Law · USPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Preclinical Surgical Research Laboratory, Colorado State UniversityYoung Investigator Grant Program, Center for Companion Animal Studies, Colorado State University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptical neuronavigation-guided intracranial surgery has become increasingly common in veterinary medicine, but its use has not yet been described in horses.

objectivesTo determine the feasibility of optical neuronavigation-guided intracranial biopsy procedures in the horse, compare the use of the standard fiducial array and anatomic landmarks for patient registration, and evaluate surgeon experience. ANIMALS: Six equine cadaver heads.

methodsComputed tomography images of each specimen were acquired, with the fiducial array rigidly secured to the frontal bone. Six targets were selected in each specimen. Patient registration was performed separately for 3 targets using the fiducial array, and for 3 targets using anatomic landmarks. In lieu of biopsy, 1 mm diameter wire seeds were placed at each target. Postoperative images were coregistered with the planning scan to calculate Euclidian distance from the tip of the seed to the target.

resultsNo statistical difference between registration techniques was identified. The impact of surgeon experience was examined for each technique using a Mann-Whitney U test. The experienced surgeon was significantly closer to the intended target (median = 2.52 mm) than were the novice surgeons (median = 6.55 mm) using the fiducial array (P = .001). Although not statistically significant (P = .31), for the experienced surgeon the median distance to target was similar when registering with the fiducial array (2.47 mm) and anatomic landmarks (2.58 mm). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Registration using both fiducial arrays and anatomic landmarks for brain biopsy using optical neuronavigation in horses is feasible.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksAnimalsBiopsyBrainHorsesNeuronavigationPilot Projectsequineintracranialintraoperative guidancenatural landmarkneurosurgerynonfiducial

Identifiers

PMID32469442
PMCPMC7379038
OpenAlexW3029867733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.