Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32469413›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Perceptions of US Adolescents and Adults With Sickle Cell Disease on Their Quality of Care.

Julie Kanter, Robert Gibson, Raymona H Lawrence, Matthew P Smeltzer, Norma L Pugh, Jeffrey Glassberg, Rita V Masese, Allison A King, Cecelia Calhoun, Jane S Hankins and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes in sickle cell disease within a conceptual model.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Julie KanterDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Birmingham.
Robert GibsonDepartment of Hematology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta.
Raymona H LawrenceJiann Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro.
Matthew P SmeltzerSchool of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
Norma L PughRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Jeffrey GlassbergMt Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Rita V MaseseDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina.
Allison A KingDepartment of Pediatrics, Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Cecelia CalhounDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Jane S HankinsDepartment of Hematology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Marsha TreadwellUniversity of California, San Francisco, Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Oakland.
Washington University in St. Louis · USAugusta University · USDuke University · USGeorgia Southern University · USRTI International · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

Implementation of Medical Homes for Evidence Based Care of Adolescents and Adults with Sickle Cell DiseaseU01HL134004 · NHLBI · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI GIBSON, ROBERT WILLIAM, KUTLAR, ABDULLAH · 2016 to 2021
$5.0M
RE-aiming at Hydroxyurea Adherence for Sickle cell with mHealth (RE-HASH)U01HL133996 · NHLBI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI HANKINS, JANE SILVA, KLESGES, LISA M · 2016 to 2021
$4.6M
SC-Links - Linking the Sickle Cell Community, Providers and Systems to Improve Sickle Cell Disease CareU01HL134007 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI TREADWELL, MARSHA J, VICHINSKY, ELLIOTT P · 2016 to 2021
$4.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL133996NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL134004NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL134007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited red blood cell disorder in the United States, and previous studies have shown that individuals with SCD are affected by multiple health disparities, including stigmatization, inequities in funding, and worse health outcomes, which may preclude their ability to access quality health care. This needs assessment was performed as part of the Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC) to assess barriers to care that may be faced by individuals with SCD. Objective: To assess the SCD-related medical care experience of adolescents and adults with SCD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This one-time survey study evaluated pain interference, quality of health care, and self-efficacy of 440 adults and adolescents (aged 15 to 50 years) with SCD of all genotypes and assessed how these variables were associated with their perceptions of outpatient and emergency department (ED) care. The surveys were administered once during office visits by trained study coordinators at 7 of 8 SCDIC sites in 2018. Results: The SCDIC sites did not report the number of individuals approached to participate in this study; thus, a response rate could not be calculated. In addition, respondents were not required to answer every question in the survey; thus, the response rate per question differed for each variable. Of 440 individuals with SCD, participants were primarily female (245 [55.7%]) and African American (428 [97.3%]) individuals, with a mean (SD) age of 27.8 (8.6) years. The majority of participants (306 of 435 [70.3%]) had hemoglobin SS or hemoglobin S β0-thalassemia. Most respondents (361 of 437 [82.6%]) reported access to nonacute (usual) SCD care, and the majority of respondents (382 of 413 [92.1%]) noted satisfaction with their usual care physician. Of 435 participants, 287 (66.0%) reported requiring an ED visit for acute pain in the previous year. Respondents were less pleased with their ED care than their usual care clinician, with approximately half (146 of 287 [50.9%]) being satisfied with or perceiving having adequate quality care in the ED. Participants also noted that when they experienced severe pain or clinician lack of empathy, this was associated with a negative quality of care. Age group was associated with ED satisfaction, with younger patients (<19 vs 19-30 and 31-50 years) reporting better ED experiences. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggested that a negative perception of care may be a barrier for patients seeking care. These findings underscore the necessity of implementation studies to improve access to quality care for this population, especially in the acute care setting.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnemia, Sickle CellEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32469413
PMCPMC7260622
OpenAlexW3032666881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.