ArticleJAMA network open2020
Perceptions of US Adolescents and Adults With Sickle Cell Disease on Their Quality of Care.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of an individualized pain plan to treat sickle cell disease vaso-occlusive episodes in the emergency department.Blood advances · 2024Trial
- A multilevel mHealth intervention boosts adherence to hydroxyurea in individuals with sickle cell disease.Blood advances · 2023Trial
- Process-related determinants of quality of care for individuals with sickle cell disease in a tertiary facility in Ghana.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
- Intranasal fentanyl and impact of an emergency department pain protocol for sickle cell disease on hospitalization rates.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Knowledge, Confidence, and Comfort Regarding Sickle Cell Disease Among Medical Students: A Pilot Study in Two Universities.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Changes in acute care use among people with sickle cell disease after adoption of a prescription drug monitoring program.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Epigenetic Aging Associations With Psychoneurological Symptoms and Social Functioning in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease.Biological research for nursing · 2024Article
- Social determinants of health and treatment center affiliation: analysis from the sickle cell disease implementation consortium registry.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #68: Sickle cell disease in pregnancy.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Service Barriers among Adults with Sickle Cell Disease in Saudi Arabia.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Family-centered communication in pediatric sickle cell disease.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2022Article
- An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes in sickle cell disease within a conceptual model.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Evaluating the implementation of a multi-level mHealth study to improve hydroxyurea utilization in sickle cell disease.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
- Sickle Cell Disease in Children and Adolescents: A Review of the Historical, Clinical, and Public Health Perspective of Sub-Saharan Africa and Beyond.International journal of pediatrics · 2022Review
- Moving Toward a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen for Acute Sickle Cell Pain with Non-Opioid Analgesic Adjuncts: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited red blood cell disorder in the United States, and previous studies have shown that individuals with SCD are affected by multiple health disparities, including stigmatization, inequities in funding, and worse health outcomes, which may preclude their ability to access quality health care. This needs assessment was performed as part of the Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC) to assess barriers to care that may be faced by individuals with SCD. Objective: To assess the SCD-related medical care experience of adolescents and adults with SCD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This one-time survey study evaluated pain interference, quality of health care, and self-efficacy of 440 adults and adolescents (aged 15 to 50 years) with SCD of all genotypes and assessed how these variables were associated with their perceptions of outpatient and emergency department (ED) care. The surveys were administered once during office visits by trained study coordinators at 7 of 8 SCDIC sites in 2018. Results: The SCDIC sites did not report the number of individuals approached to participate in this study; thus, a response rate could not be calculated. In addition, respondents were not required to answer every question in the survey; thus, the response rate per question differed for each variable. Of 440 individuals with SCD, participants were primarily female (245 [55.7%]) and African American (428 [97.3%]) individuals, with a mean (SD) age of 27.8 (8.6) years. The majority of participants (306 of 435 [70.3%]) had hemoglobin SS or hemoglobin S β0-thalassemia. Most respondents (361 of 437 [82.6%]) reported access to nonacute (usual) SCD care, and the majority of respondents (382 of 413 [92.1%]) noted satisfaction with their usual care physician. Of 435 participants, 287 (66.0%) reported requiring an ED visit for acute pain in the previous year. Respondents were less pleased with their ED care than their usual care clinician, with approximately half (146 of 287 [50.9%]) being satisfied with or perceiving having adequate quality care in the ED. Participants also noted that when they experienced severe pain or clinician lack of empathy, this was associated with a negative quality of care. Age group was associated with ED satisfaction, with younger patients (<19 vs 19-30 and 31-50 years) reporting better ED experiences. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggested that a negative perception of care may be a barrier for patients seeking care. These findings underscore the necessity of implementation studies to improve access to quality care for this population, especially in the acute care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.