Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32469386›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2020

FOLFIRINOX for the Treatment of Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancers: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Haeseong Park, Ramon U Jin, Andrea Wang-Gillam, Rama Suresh, Caron Rigden, Manik Amin, Benjamin R Tan, Katrina S Pedersen, Kian-Huat Lim, Nikolaos A Trikalinos and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01928290 (Phase II Study of FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy for Treatment of Advanced Gastric, Gastro-esophageal Junction, and Esophageal Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01928290 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Study of FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy for Treatment of Advanced Gastric, Gastro-esophageal Junction, and Esophageal Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2013 to 2019Enrolled67ConditionsStomach Neoplasms, Esophageal NeoplasmsArmsIrinotecan, Trastuzumab, Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin, Fluorouracil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haeseong ParkDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Ramon U JinDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Andrea Wang-GillamDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Rama SureshDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Caron RigdenDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Manik AminDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Benjamin R TanDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Katrina S PedersenDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Kian-Huat LimDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Nikolaos A TrikalinosDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Abhilasha AcharyaDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Megan L CopseyDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Katherine A NavoDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Ashley E MortonDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Feng GaoDivision of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
A Craig LockhartSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
PRE-AND POSTGRADUATE TRAINING IN MOLECULAR HEMATOLOGYT32HL007088 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Grant Anthony Challen, Stephen Oh · 1985 to 2026
$14.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Standard first-line regimens for patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas have an approximate 40% objective response rate (ORR). The combination of leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) has been efficacious as first-line therapy for other gastrointestinal cancers, such as pancreatic and colon cancers. Objective: To evaluate the clinical activity and safety of FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is an open-label, single-arm phase 2 study of first-line FOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Estimated sample size included 41 patients with ERBB2-negative disease with 90% power to detect an ORR of 60% or greater with α of .10. No enrollment goal was planned for ERBB2-positive patients, but they were allowed to receive trastuzumab in combination with FOLFIRINOX. Interventions: Starting doses were fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2 bolus, followed by 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hours; leucovorin, 400 mg/m2; irinotecan, 180 mg/m2; and oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2. Trastuzumab was administered as a 6 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 4 mg/kg every 14 days in patients with ERBB2-positive disease. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was ORR by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary end points included safety profile, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response. Results: From November 2013 to May 2018, 67 patients were enrolled (median [range] age, 59.0 [34-78] years; including 56 [84%] men), and 26 of 67 (39%) had ERBB2-positive disease. Median follow-up was 17.4 months. The ORR was 61%(95% CI, 44.5%-75.8%) (25 of 41) in the ERBB2-negative group and 85% (95% CI, 65.1%-95.6%) (22 of 26) in the ERBB2-positive group, including 1 patient with complete response. For ERBB2-negative patients, median PFS was 8.4 months and median OS was 15.5 months; for ERBB2-positive patients, median PFS was 13.8 months and median OS was 19.6 months. Fifty-six patients (84%) had dose modifications or treatment delays. The most common toxic effects were neutropenia (91%, n = 61), diarrhea (63%, n = 42), peripheral sensory neuropathy (61%, n = 41), and nausea (48%, n = 32), with no unexpected toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance: The FOLFIRINOX regimen with or without trastuzumab was associated with improved ORR and PFS in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in the first-line setting. This regimen may be a reasonable therapeutic option for patients with preserved performance status. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01928290.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDiarrheaEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFluorouracilHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedNauseaNeutropeniaOxaliplatinFluorouracilfolfirinoxIrinotecanLeucovorinOxaliplatinTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID32469386
PMCPMC7260693
OpenAlexW3029901399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.