Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32469320›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Determining the Topic Evolution and Sentiment Polarity for Albinism in a Chinese Online Health Community: Machine Learning and Social Network Analysis.

Qiqing Bi, Lining Shen, Richard Evans, Zhiguo Zhang, Shimin Wang, Wei Dai, Cui Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Opportunities and pitfalls of social media research in rare genetic diseases: a systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qiqing Bi *School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0221-5211
Lining Shen *School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7311-8777
Richard EvansCollege of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-0560
Zhiguo ZhangSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5081-4382
Shimin WangSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4247-6317
Wei DaiSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5090-8832
Cui LiuSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-3881
Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNBrunel University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are more than 6000 rare diseases in existence today, with the number of patients with these conditions rapidly increasing. Most research to date has focused on the diagnosis, treatment, and development of orphan drugs, while few studies have examined the topics and emotions expressed by patients living with rare diseases on social media platforms, especially in online health communities (OHCs).

objectiveThis study aimed to determine the topic categorizations and sentiment polarity for albinism in a Chinese OHC, Baidu Tieba, using multiple methods. The OHC was deeply mined using topic mining, social network analysis, and sentiment polarity analysis. Through these methods, we determined the current situation of community construction, identifying the ongoing needs and problems experienced by people with albinism in their daily lives.

methodsWe used the albinism community on the Baidu Tieba platform as the data source in this study. Term frequency-inverse document frequency, latent dirichlet allocation models, and naive Bayes were employed to mine the various topic categories. Social network analysis, which was completed using the Gephi tool, was employed to analyze the evolution of the albinism community. Sentiment polarity analysis was performed using a long short-term memory algorithm.

resultsWe identified 8 main topics discussed in the community: daily sharing, family, interpersonal communication, social life and security, medical care, occupation and education, beauty, and self-care. Among these topics, daily sharing represented the largest proportion of the discussions. From 2012 to 2019, the average degree and clustering coefficient of the albinism community continued to decline, while the network center transferred from core communities to core users. A total of 68.43% of the corpus was emotional, with 35.88% being positive and 32.55% negative. There were statistically significant differences in the distribution of sentiment polarity between topics (P<.001). Negative emotions were twice as high as positive emotions in the social life and security topic.

conclusionsThe study reveals insights into the emotions expressed by people with albinism in the Chinese OHC, Baidu Tieba, providing health care practitioners with greater appreciation of the current emotional support needed by patients and the patient experience. Current OHCs do not exert enough influence due to limited effective organization and development. Health care sectors should take greater advantage of OHCs to support vulnerable patients with rare diseases to meet their evidence-based needs.

Indexed as

albinismmachine learningonline health communityrare diseasessentiment polaritysocial network analysistopic mining

Identifiers

PMID32469320
PMCPMC7293058
OpenAlexW3013607005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.