Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32469161›Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2020

Change in modifiable maternal characteristics and behaviours between consecutive pregnancies and offspring adiposity: A systematic review.

Elizabeth J Taylor, Sam Wilding, Nida Ziauddeen, Keith M Godfrey, Ann Berrington, Nisreen A Alwan

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth J TaylorSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7680-2865
Sam WildingSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4184-2821
Nida ZiauddeenSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Keith M GodfreyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Ann BerringtonDepartment of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Nisreen A AlwanSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GB

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Network on Early Adversity & Later Life ReversibilityU24AG047867 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GODFREY, KEITH, MCEWEN, BRUCE S. · 2014 to 2018
$954k
British Heart Foundation RG/15/17/31749Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4NIA NIH HHS U24 AG047867Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Causal evidence links modifiable maternal exposures during the periconceptional period with offspring obesity. The interconception period may be an important time to intervene. We systematically identified studies examining change in modifiable maternal exposures between pregnancies and offspring adiposity. We searched for longitudinal studies published between 1990 and 2019, which included measurements taken on at least two occasions in the period from 1 year prior to the conception of the first birth to the time of the second birth, and which included a measure of adiposity in second, or higher order, siblings. Age, ethnicity and genetics were not considered modifiable; all other factors including length of the interpregnancy interval were. Eleven studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Higher interpregnancy weight gain or loss, maternal smoking inception, mothers smoking in their first pregnancy and quitting, increasing the number of cigarettes smoked and longer interpregnancy intervals were positively associated with adiposity in second or higher order children. Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery was protective. Further research is needed to ascertain whether the risk of adiposity is fixed based on first pregnancy exposures or if interpregnancy change alters the risk for a subsequent child. This can inform the type and effectiveness of interventions for mothers prior to a subsequent pregnancy.

Indexed as

AdiposityBirth IntervalsMaternal ExposureAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleObesityPregnancyRisk FactorsYoung Adultadipositychildhoodinterpregnancyobesity

Identifiers

PMID32469161
PMCPMC7116176
OpenAlexW3030920108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.