Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32468988›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2020

The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the medico-legal and human rights of psychiatric patients.

Johannes Thome, Andrew N Coogan, Frederick Simon, Matthias Fischer, Oliver Tucha, Frank Faltraco, Donatella Marazziti, Hermann Butzer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Early Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health Facilities and Psychiatric Professionals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. One year after the COVID-19: What have we learnt, what shall we do next?European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Johannes ThomeClinic and Policlinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2814-2153
Andrew N CooganDepartment of Psychology, Maynooth University, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland.
Frederick SimonClinic and Policlinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7012-0927
Matthias FischerClinic and Policlinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0327-3269
Oliver TuchaDepartment of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8427-5279
Frank FaltracoClinic and Policlinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7943-7971
Donatella MarazzitiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Hermann ButzerLaw School, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
University of Rostock · DELeibniz University Hannover · DENational University of Ireland, Maynooth · IEUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised significant concerns for population mental health and the effective provision of mental health services in the light of increased demands and barriers to service delivery [1]. Particular attention is being directed toward the possible neuropsychiatric sequelae of both COVID-19 and of the stringent societal mitigation steps deployed by national governments, concerns that are informed by historical increases in the incidence of psychotic disorders following influenza pandemics [2]. However, so far there has been scant attention paid to other important areas of psychiatry during COVID-19, including medico-legal aspects and human rights. In this paper, we discuss the legal implications for psychiatry of the COVID-19 pandemic and report a novel situation in which psychiatric patients may experience diminution of their statutory protections. We believe that this represents a paradigm shift in psychiatric care and that the consideration of the fundamental rights of psychiatric patients as "less important" than infection control measures compel mental health professionals to "advocate for … patients and their caregivers" in this time of crisis [1].

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsHuman RightsMental HealthMental Health ServicesPandemicsPersons with Psychiatric DisordersPneumonia, ViralBetacoronavirusCivil RightsCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksHealth PersonnelHumansPsychiatrySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32468988
PMCPMC7280152
OpenAlexW3030828899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.