Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32468987›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2020

Ultra-processed food and beverage advertising on Brazilian television by International Network for Food and Obesity/Non-Communicable Diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support benchmark.

Julia Soares Guimarães, Laís Amaral Mais, Fernanda Helena Marrocos Leite, Paula Martins Horta, Marina Oliveira Santana, Ana Paula Bortoletto Martins, Rafael Moreira Claro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Educational inequality in consumption ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia Soares GuimarãesFederal University of Minas Gerais (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG), Department of Nutrition, Belo Horizonte, MG30130-100, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9107-6662
Laís Amaral MaisBrazilian Institute for Consumer Defense (Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor - IDEC), Department of Healthy and Sustainable Diets, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda Helena Marrocos LeiteBrazilian Institute for Consumer Defense (Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor - IDEC), Department of Healthy and Sustainable Diets, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Paula Martins HortaFederal University of Minas Gerais (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG), Department of Nutrition, Belo Horizonte, MG30130-100, Brazil.
Marina Oliveira SantanaFederal University of Minas Gerais (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG), Department of Nutrition, Belo Horizonte, MG30130-100, Brazil.
Ana Paula Bortoletto MartinsBrazilian Institute for Consumer Defense (Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor - IDEC), Department of Healthy and Sustainable Diets, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Rafael Moreira ClaroFederal University of Minas Gerais (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG), Department of Nutrition, Belo Horizonte, MG30130-100, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyse the extent and nature of food and beverage advertising on the three major Brazilian free-to-air television (TV) channels.

designCross-sectional study. A protocol developed for the International Network for Food and Obesity/Non-Communicable Diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support was applied for data collection. A total of 432 h of TV programming was recorded from 06.00 to 24.00 hours, for eight non-consecutive and randomly selected days, in April 2018. All TV advertisements (ads) were analysed, and food-related ads were classified according to the NOVA classification system. Descriptive analyses were used to describe the number and type of ads, food categories and the distribution of ads throughout the day and time of the day.

settingThe three most popular free-to-air channels on Brazilian TV.

participantsThe study did not involve human subjects.

resultsIn total, 14·2 % (n 1156 out of 7991) of ads were food related (858 were specific food items). Approximately 91 % of food items ads included ultra-processed food (UPF) products. The top three most promoted products were soft drinks, alcoholic beverages and fast-food meals. Alcoholic beverage ads were more frequently broadcast in the evening.

conclusionThe high risk of exposure of the Brazilian population to UPF ads should be considered a public health concern given the impact of unhealthy food advertising on people's food choices and health.

Indexed as

AdvertisingBeveragesFoodTelevisionBenchmarkingBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFast FoodsFood IndustryHumansAdvertisingFoodInternational Network for Food and Obesity/Non-Communicable Diseases Research, Monitoring and Action SupportSurveillanceTelevision

Identifiers

PMID32468987
PMCPMC7477364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.