Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32468741›Full record

ArticleInfection & chemotherapy2020

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Two Voriconazole Formulations after Intravenous Infusion in Healthy Korean Volunteers.

Sang Heon Cho, Cheol Woo Kim, Moon Suk Nam

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection & chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02631954 (Phase I Clinical Trial for Comparison of Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Vorico Injection 200mg), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02631954 phase1completednot on this map

Phase I Clinical Trial for Comparison of Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Vorico Injection 200mg(Voriconazole) and Vfend® IV 200mg for Single Dose Crossover Intravenous Infusion in Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorChong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalRan2015 to 2015Enrolled24ConditionsAspergillus Infections, Candida Infections, Fungal InfectionsArmsVorico Injection 200mg(Voriconazole), Vfend®(Voriconazole) IV 200mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sang Heon ChoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. shcho123@inha.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0841-9602
Cheol Woo KimDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4306-1367
Moon Suk NamDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1756-8498
Inha University Hospital · KR

Funding

Inha University INHA-47303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVoriconazole, a triazole antifungal agent exhibits broad-spectrum antifungal activity. It is used to treat severe, invasive fungal infections, including invasive aspergillosis and candidemia. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of a test formulation (Vorico® Injection) and reference formulation (Vfend® IV) of voriconazole. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, three-group, two-treatment, two-sequence, two-period, crossover phase I trial with 7-day washout periods (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02631954). Twenty-four healthy Korean male subjects were recruited. In each group, eight subjects were randomized in a 1:1 manner to receive a single dose of 200 mg test or reference formulation intravenously over 1.5 h. Blood samples were collected over 24 h post-dose, and plasma drug concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a non-compartmental analysis, and safety was evaluated.

resultsTwenty-three subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of the test formulation to reference formulation was 0.9570 (0.8178 - 1.1199) for the maximum plasma concentration (C

conclusionEquivalent pharmacokinetic characteristics that satisfied the criteria of bioequivalence and similar safety profiles were observed for both test and reference formulations of voriconazole.

Indexed as

BioequivalencePharmacokineticsSafetyVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID32468741
PMCPMC7335652
OpenAlexW3027703215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.