Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32468445›Full record

ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2020

CD105 is a prognostic marker and valid endothelial target for microbubble platforms in cholangiocarcinoma.

Amit Nair, Nicola Ingram, Eldo T Verghese, Imeshi Wijetunga, Alexander F Markham, Judy Wyatt, K Rajendra Prasad, P Louise Coletta

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Biomaterials-Mediated Tumor Infarction Therapy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. TargetingCancers · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amit NairLeeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK. nair.amit@doctors.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1344-392X
Nicola IngramLeeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Eldo T VergheseLeeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Imeshi WijetungaLeeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Alexander F MarkhamLeeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Judy WyattDepartment of Histopathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
K Rajendra PrasadDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
P Louise ColettaLeeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
St James's University Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L01629X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current treatment outcomes in cholangiocarcinoma are poor with cure afforded only by surgical extirpation. The efficacy of targeting the tumoural endothelial marker CD105 in cholangiocarcinoma, as a basis for potential microbubble-based treatment, is unknown and was explored here.

methodsTissue expression of CD105 was quantified using immunohistochemistry in 54 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma samples from patients who underwent resection in a single centre over a ten-year period, and analysed against clinicopathological data. In vitro flow assays using microbubbles functionalised with CD105 antibody were conducted to ascertain specificity of binding to murine SVR endothelial cells. Finally, CD105-microbubbles were intravenously administered to 10 Balb/c nude mice bearing heterotopic subcutaneous human extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (TFK-1 and EGI-1) xenografts after which in vivo binding was assessed following contrast-enhanced destruction replenishment ultrasound application.

resultsThough not significantly associated with any examined clinicopathological variable, we found that higher CD105 expression was independently associated with poorer patient survival (median 12 vs 31 months; p = 0.002). In vitro studies revealed significant binding of CD105-microbubbles to SVR endothelial cells in comparison to isotype control (p = 0.01), as well as in vivo to TFK-1 (p = 0.02) and EGI-1 (p = 0.04) mouse xenograft vasculature.

conclusionOur results indicate that CD105 is a biomarker eminently suitable for cholangiocarcinoma targeting using functionalised microbubbles.

Indexed as

MicrobubblesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsBile Duct NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCapillariesCell Line, TumorCholangiocarcinomaEndoglinEndothelial CellsFemaleHumansMaleMiceBiomarkers, TumorEndoglinENG protein, humanPlatelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1Bile duct cancerBiliary tract cancerCD105EndoglinMicrobubblePerihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID32468445
PMCPMC7581571
OpenAlexW3031217868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.