Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32468439›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2020

Identifying visible minorities or racialized persons on surveys: can we just ask?

Greta R Bauer, Mayuri Mahendran, Jessica Braimoh, Sejutie Alam, Siobhan Churchill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Call to modernize measurement of gender, race, and ethnicity.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Greta R BauerEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, K201 Kresge Bldg, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada. gbauer@uwo.ca.
Mayuri MahendranEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, K201 Kresge Bldg, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada.
Jessica BraimohEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, K201 Kresge Bldg, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada.
Sejutie AlamEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, K201 Kresge Bldg, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada.
Siobhan ChurchillEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, K201 Kresge Bldg, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada.

Funding

CIHR FRN 130489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVisible minorities are a group categorized in health research to identify and track inequalities, or to study the impact of racialization. We compared classifications obtained from a commonly used measure (Statistics Canada standard) with those obtained by two direct questions-whether one is a member of a visible minority group and whether one is perceived or treated as a person of colour.

methodsA mixed-methods analysis was conducted using data from an English-language online survey (n = 311) and cognitive interviews with a maximum diversity subsample (n = 79). Participants were Canadian residents age 14 and older.

resultsAgreement between the single visible minority item and the standard was good (Cohen's Κ = 0.725; 95% CI = 0.629, 0.820). However, participants understood "visible minority" in different and often literal ways, sometimes including those living with visible disabilities or who were visibly transgender or poor. Agreement between the single person of colour item and the standard was very good (Κ = 0.830; 95% CI = 0.747, 0.913). "Person of colour" was more clearly understood to reflect ethnoracial background and may better capture the group likely to be targeted for racism than the Statistics Canada standard. When Indigenous participants who reported being persons of colour were reclassified to reflect the government definition of visible minority as non-Indigenous, this measure had strong agreement with the current federal standard measure (K = 0.851; 95% CI = 0.772, 0.930).

conclusionA single question on perception or treatment as a person of colour appears to well identify racialized persons and may alternately be recoded to approximate government classification of visible minorities.

Indexed as

Minority GroupsRacial GroupsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultEthnic groupsPopulation healthQuestionnaire designRaceSurveys

Identifiers

PMID32468439
PMCPMC7351896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.