Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32468408›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2020

Preserved Extrastriatal

Nicolas Nicastro, Pierre R Burkhard, Valentina Garibotto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unexpected (Journal of neurology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolas NicastroDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. nicolas.nicastro@hcuge.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5836-0792
Pierre R BurkhardDivision of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, 4 rue G. Perret-Gentil, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Valentina GaribottoFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CHUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeScans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD) have been initially described in a minority of subjects with suspected Parkinson's disease (PD). Although a highly controversial entity, longitudinal studies showed that SWEDD cases mostly involve non-degenerative conditions mimicking PD or misattribution of scan images to normal status. Using the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort, we undertook a case-controlled analysis of [123I]N-ω-fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-iodophenyl nortropane ([123I]FP-CIT) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images to measure extrastriatal serotonergic transporter (SERT) density in SWEDD and PD. PROCEDURES: We included 37 SWEDD cases (mean age 60 years, 33 % female) with available [123I]FP-CIT SPECT imaging and high-resolution T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for coregistration. Sixty-one controls and 62 similarly aged PD subjects were included for group comparisons. Regional [123I]FP-CIT was extracted with PETPVE12 using geometric transfer matrix and partial volume effect correction.

resultsPD subjects showed significantly lower [123I]FP-CIT binding in both striatal (caudate nucleus and putamen) and extrastriatal regions (pallidum and insula) compared with controls and SWEDD (all between-group p < 0.0001). PD group also showed lower binding in the thalamus relative to controls (p = 0.007). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) did not show a significant difference when using extrastriatal region in addition to striatal ROIs for the separation of SWEDD and PD (95 % ROC-AUC for both methods, p = 0.52). In addition, striatal [123I]FP-CIT binding contralateral to the clinically more affected side was usually lower for PD (> 75 %) but not for SWEDD (< 49 %, p < 0.002). No significant difference regarding [123I]FP-CIT binding was observed between SWEDD and controls.

conclusionThese findings corroborate the view that SWEDD cases represent a heterogeneous group of conditions not involving dopaminergic and serotonergic terminals. Further studies are warranted to be assessed whether using extrastriatal [123I]FP-CIT evaluation can be of help in the assessment of degenerative parkinsonism.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCorpus StriatumDisease ProgressionDopamineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityParkinson DiseaseTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTropanes2-carbomethoxy-8-(3-fluoropropyl)-3-(4-iodophenyl)tropaneDopamineTropanes[123I]FP-CITDegenerative parkinsonismDopamineExtrastriatalSerotoninSPECT

Identifiers

PMID32468408
OpenAlexW3030929892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.