ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021
Clinicians' perspective on the implemented KLIK PROM portal in clinical practice.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Pooled it
- Psychometric properties and outcomes of the PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction measures in individuals with congenital bleeding disorders.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Development of a Core Patient-Reported Outcome (Measures) Set for Pediatric Physical Therapy.Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association · 2026Article
- From framework to practice: applying the proteus-practice framework to learn lessons for integrating PROs in clinical care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Case Series: Can Daily Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Be Implemented for Cancer-Related Fatigue?Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- What Matters Most? Developing a Core Patient Reported Outcome Set for Individuals With Genetic Intellectual Disabilities: An International Delphi Study.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2026Article
- Patient reported outcomes in pediatric physical therapy: a scoping review and evidence map.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Review
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on assessing selected patient-reported outcome measures in specialist palliative care institutions: a multi-country mixed-methods study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- How do clinicians use, experience, and value applications of outcome information in daily care? A mixed-methods study.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care: co-design of tools from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Article
- Enhancing Clinicians' Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Outpatient Care: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- PROs for RARE: protocol for development of a core patient reported outcome set for individuals with genetic intellectual disability.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- User-Centered Design and Usability of Voxe as a Pediatric Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Platform: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Psychometrics of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system in von Willebrand disease, inherited platelet function disorders, and rare bleeding disorders.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Perspectives of Patients and Professionals on Implementing a Computer Adaptive Vision-Related Quality of Life Outcome (CAT-EyeQ) in Clinical Practice.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Monitoring health related quality of life in survivorship care of young adult survivors of childhood cancer using web-based patient-reported outcome measures: survivors' and health care practitioners' perspectives on the KLIK method.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Article
- Facing the challenges of PROM implementation in Dutch dialysis care: Patients' and professionals' perspectives.PloS one · 2023Article
- The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Daily Clinical Practice of a Pediatric Nephrology Department.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Patients' and parents' perspective on the implementation of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in pediatric clinical practice using the KLIK PROM portal.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSince 2011, the evidence-based KLIK Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) portal has been implemented in clinical practice in > 20 Dutch hospitals. Patients and/or parents complete PROMs on Health Related Quality of Life, symptoms and psychosocial functioning before their outpatient consultation. Answers are converted into an ePROfile and discussed by clinicians during consultation to monitor well-being over time and detect problems early. This study aims to get insight into the KLIK implementation from the clinician's perspective.
methodsAs part of the KLIK implementation process, annual meetings were held with multidisciplinary teams to evaluate the use of KLIK. An online questionnaire was sent regarding (1) overall satisfaction, (2) feeling competent to discuss PROMs, (3) use of KLIK during the consultation, (4) influence of KLIK on the consultation, (5) usability of the KLIK PROM portal, (6) satisfaction with PROMs and feedback, and (7) support of the KLIK expert team. Open questions about (dis)advantages were included. Descriptive analyses were used.
resultsOne hundred and forty-eight clinicians (response-rate 61%) from 14 hospitals in the Netherlands participated. Results show that: (1) clinicians report an overall satisfaction of median = 69/100 (visual analogue scale), (2) 85.8% feel competent discussing the ePROfile, (3) 70.3% (almost) always discuss the ePROfile, (4) 70.3% think that KLIK improves consultation, (5) 71.6% think KLIK is easy to use, (6) 80.4% are satisfied with the feedback of the overall KLIK ePROfile, (7) 71.6% experience sufficient support of the KLIK team.
conclusionParticipating clinicians are generally satisfied with KLIK. Improvements to the KLIK PROM portal are now realized based on the mentioned disadvantages (e.g., shorten PROM completion by use of PROMIS and integrating KLIK with Electronic Health Records).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.