Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32468366›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Hydrogeochemical investigation of arsenic in drinking water of schools and age dependent risk assessment in Vehari District, Punjab Pakistan: a multivariate analysis.

Behzad Murtaza, Humaira Nazeer, Natasha, Muhammad Amjad, Muhammad Imran, Muhammad Shahid, Noor S Shah, Abu Bakr Umer Farooq, Muhammad Amjad, Ghulam Murtaza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Behzad MurtazaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan. behzadmurtaza@cuivehari.edu.pk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9267-041X
Humaira NazeerDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
NatashaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Muhammad AmjadDistrict Water Testing Laboratory, Public Health Engineering Department, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Muhammad ImranDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Muhammad ShahidDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Noor S ShahDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Abu Bakr Umer FarooqDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Muhammad AmjadDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Ghulam MurtazaInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan. gmurtazauaf@gmail.com.
COMSATS University Islamabad · PKUniversity of Faisalabad · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, a large number of school-aged children is suffering from water-borne diseases, particularly in low-income countries. Arsenic (As) is a hazardous and potentially carcinogenic metal(loid) in drinking water. Nowadays, alarming levels of As have been reported in the groundwater of Vehari District, Punjab Pakistan. In this study, drinking water supplies for high and higher secondary schools were examined in Vehari District. A total of 164 water samples were collected from schools and subjected to heavy metal(loid) analysis (As) and basic water physicochemical parameters. The results were analyzed with respect to sampling area, school type, school education level, sources of sample collection, and the depth of the source. The results revealed that As concentration of water samples in boys' and girls' schools was 12.8 μg/L and 9.2 μg/L, respectively. However, when the As concentration in drinking water was evaluated at the school education level, a notable higher concentration of As was observed in the higher secondary schools than the high schools with an average of 19.5 and 9.7 μg/L, respectively. The risk assessment indices were calculated based on education level and different age groups of the children (primary, elementary, high, and higher secondary). High carcinogenic (cancer risk = 0.001) and non-carcinogenic (hazard quotient = 2.0) risks were noted for the children in higher secondary school. The current findings anticipated that the drinking water of schools in Vehari District did not meet the requirement of the World Health Organization (WHO) drinking water quality guidelines. Safe drinking water is crucial for the development and growth of children. Therefore, it is important for educational authorities to take steps for provision of As free safe drinking water to students and local inhabitants.

Indexed as

GroundwaterArsenicChildDrinking WaterFemaleHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisPakistanRisk AssessmentSchoolsWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicChildrenDrinking waterHealth riskPakistanSchoolsVehari

Identifiers

PMID32468366
OpenAlexW3089234673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.