Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32468328›Full record

ReviewNeurocritical care2021

The Limited Impact of Current Therapeutic Interventions on Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Overview.

Logan Froese, Carleen Batson, Alwyn Gomez, Josh Dian, Frederick A Zeiler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The State of Autoregulation.Neurocritical care · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Logan FroeseBiomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Carleen BatsonDepartment of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Alwyn GomezDepartment of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Josh DianDepartment of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Frederick A ZeilerBiomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. Frederick.Zeiler@umanitoba.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1737-0510
University of Manitoba · CAAddenbrooke's Hospital · GB

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current intensive care unit (ICU) treatment strategies for traumatic brain injury (TBI) care focus on intracranial pressure (ICP)- and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP)-directed therapeutics, dictated by guidelines. Impaired cerebrovascular reactivity in moderate/severe TBI is emerging as a major associate with poor outcome and appears to dominate the landscape of physiologic derangement over the course of a patient's ICU stay. Within this article, we review the literature on the known drivers of impaired cerebrovascular reactivity in adult TBI, highlight the current knowledge surrounding the impact of guideline treatment strategies on continuously monitored cerebrovascular reactivity, and discuss current treatment paradigms for impaired reactivity. Finally, we touch on the areas of future research, as we strive to develop specific therapeutics for impaired cerebrovascular reactivity in TBI. There exists limited literature to suggest advanced age, intracranial injury patterns of diffuse injury, and sustained ICP elevations may drive impaired cerebrovascular reactivity. To date, the literature suggests there is a limited impact of such ICP/CPP guideline-based therapies on cerebrovascular reactivity, with large portions of a given patients ICU period spent with impaired cerebrovascular reactivity. Emerging treatment paradigms focus on the targeting individualized CPP and ICP thresholds based on cerebrovascular reactivity, without directly targeting the pathways involved in its dysfunction. Further work involved in uncovering the molecular pathways involved in impaired cerebrovascular reactivity is required, so that we can develop therapeutics directed at its prevention and treatment.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticIntracranial HypertensionAdultCerebrovascular CirculationHumansIntracranial PressureMonitoring, PhysiologicRetrospective StudiesAutoregulationCerebrovascular reactivityTBITherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID32468328
OpenAlexW3032472634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.