ArticleClinical rheumatology2020
Early diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis among psoriasis patients: clinical experience sharing.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Immature Granulocyte Count and Percentage as Novel Indicators of Systemic Inflammation in Plaque Psoriasis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Potential of Circulating MicroRNA Panels to Discriminate Peripheral Arthritis in the Spondyloarthritis Spectrum: A Preliminary and Validation Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Multi-omics insights into spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: integrating genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and the microbiome for immunological and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Gout, Hyperuricemia and Psoriatic Arthritis: An Evolving Conundrum.Current rheumatology reports · 2025Review
- Review
- Biological therapy for psoriatic arthritis: current state and future perspectives.Rheumatology international · 2024Review
- Immunomodulatory nano-preparations for rheumatoid arthritis.Drug delivery · 2023Review
- The Psoriatic Arthritis Experience in Saudi Arabia from the Rheumatologist and Patient Perspectives.Current rheumatology reviews · 2023Observational
- Various Application of Tofacitinib and Ruxolitinib (Janus Kinase Inhibitors) in Dermatology and Rheumatology: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Perspective.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2022Review
- Gut microbiota differences between psoriatic arthritis and other undifferentiated arthritis: A pilot study.Medicine · 2022Article
- Psoriatic arthritis: prospects for the future.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022Review
- Disease activity indices in psoriatic arthritis: current and evolving concepts.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Review
- Psoriatic Arthritis and Metabolic Syndrome: Is There a Role for Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs?Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Psoriatic arthritis and the association with cardiometabolic disease: a narrative review.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe early detection of psoriatic arthritis (PSA) poses a challenge to rheumatologists, even when their diagnosis is aided by sonography. In order to facilitate early detection of PSA among patients with psoriasis (PSO), we retrospectively analyzed of the relationships between serological markers and comorbidities in 629 psoriatic patients, 102 of which had PSA, while the other 527 had PSO.
resultsSerological markers were found not to be useful in distinguishing between PSA and PSO (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). The prevalence rate of PSA among PSO patients was around 19.4%. Two components of metabolic syndrome-hyperlipidemia (2.94%) and gout (4.9%)-were significantly more prevalent in PSA patients than in PSO patients (p < 0.05). The odds ratio for PSA is 15.94 in patients with hyperlipidemia with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.64-154.80; meanwhile, the odds ratio for PSA is 3.83 in patients with gout with a 95% CI of 1.19-12.31. Allergic rhinitis (5.88%) was more prevalent in PSA patients than in PSO patients (p < 0.01). The odds ratio was 8.17 in patients with allergic rhinitis with a 95% CI of 2.26-29.50. Plasma hs-miR-210-3p distinguishes PSA from PSO, and its levels can also be distinguished from PSA after treated with anti-TNFα biologics agents (both p < 0.05).
conclusionsNo clinical available serology markers, but hyperlipidemia, gout, axial spondylopathy (inflammatory back pain), or allergic rhinitis, could differentiate between psoriatic arthritis from psoriasis. Plasma hs-miR-210-3p and comorbidities may differentiate psoriatic arthritis from psoriasis. Key Points • Clinical manifestations and comorbidities are different between psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis only patients. • Traditional serology markers are similar between psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis-only patients. • Plasma hs-miR-210-3p distinguishes PSA from PSO, and its levels can also be distinguished from PSA after treated with anti-TNFα biologics agents in our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.