ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020
Machine learning-based operation skills assessment with vascular difficulty index for vascular intervention surgery.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming Surgical Training With AI Techniques for Training, Assessment, and Evaluation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Robotic-Assisted Vascular Surgery: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Predicting future occlusion or stenosis of lower extremity bypass grafts using artificial intelligence to simultaneously analyze all flow velocities collected in current and previous ultrasound examinations.JVS-vascular science · 2024Article
- An Image Information-Based Objective Assessment Method of Technical Manipulation Skills for Intravascular Interventions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Kinetics Analysis and ADRC-Based Controller for a String-Driven Vascular Intervention Surgical Robotic System.Micromachines · 2022Article
- ADRC-Based Control Method for the Vascular Intervention Master-Slave Surgical Robotic System.Micromachines · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An accurate assessment of surgical operation skills is essential for improving the vascular intervention surgical outcome and the performance of endovascular surgery robots. In existing studies, subjective and objective assessments of surgical operation skills use a variety of indicators, such as the operation speed and operation smoothness. However, the vascular conditions of particular patients have not been considered in the assessment, leading to deviations in the evaluation. Therefore, in this paper, an operation skills assessment method including the vascular difficulty level index for catheter insertion at the aortic arch in endovascular surgery is proposed. First, the model describing the difficulty of the vascular anatomical structure is established with characteristics of different aortic arch branches based on machine learning. Afterwards, the vascular difficulty level is set as an objective index combined with operating characteristics extracted from the operations performed by surgeons to evaluate the surgical operation skills at the aortic arch using machine learning. The accuracy of the assessment improves from 86.67 to 96.67% after inclusion of the vascular difficulty as an evaluation indicator to more objectively and accurately evaluate skills. The method described in this paper can be adopted to train novice surgeons in endovascular surgery, and for studies of vascular interventional surgery robots. Graphical abstract Operation skill assessment with vascular difficulty for vascular interventional surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32468299What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.