ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2020
[Antihistamines for treating pruritus : The end of an era?]
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025Guideline
- International survey of treatment practices for atopic dermatitis in pregnant and breastfeeding women: Physician perspectives.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025Article
- [Pruritus in atopic dermatitis-comparative evaluation of novel treatment approaches].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antihistamines, mostly H1 antihistamines, administered both topically and systemically, are among the most widely used drugs. While systemically applicable antihistamines are usually taken orally or administered intravenously, while local therapy is used on the eye, nose or skin. Systemic antihistamines are most frequently used during the pollen season (hay fever, asthma) or are used all year round, e.g., for house dust and animal hair allergies. Furthermore, urticaria is a major indication for the use of H1 antihistamines, also as long-term treatment. Although H1 antihistamines are not licensed for pruritus and prurigo, they are frequently used in these diseases. However, since in many diseases with pruritus and prurigo the histamine receptor does not play a decisive role in the pathogenesis of pruritus, they show limited efficacy. Two Cochrane reviews have not shown any significant antipruritic effects of H1 antihistamine treatment in atopic eczema as single therapy or in combination, e.g., with topical glucocorticosteroid therapy. A retrospective case series with a so-called high-dose antihistamine therapy with non-sedating antihistamines was effective in treating chronic pruritus. This article summarizes the possibilities of systemic antihistamines in pruritus, especially with regard to limitations and future prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.