SynthesisDrug safety2020
Remdesivir in Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Benefit-Risk Assessment.
Synthesis in Drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04560231 (Is Remdesivir a Possible Therapeutic Option for SARS-CoV-2), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Is Remdesivir a Possible Therapeutic Option for SARS-CoV-2 : An Interventional Study
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of remdesivir for patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Benefit-Risk Assessment of Chinese Medicine Injections for Primary Liver Cancer Based on Multi-criteria Decision Analysis.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Infection · 2022Pooled it
- Medication errors and associated serious outcomes in COVID-19 antivirals: a real-world study based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026Article
- Remdesivir in COVID-19: pros and cons.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Elevated Cardiac Troponin I as a Mortality Predictor in Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Observational
- Deuterated Drugs and Biomarkers in the COVID-19 Pandemic.ACS omega · 2022Review
- Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- The utility of remdesivir in SARS-CoV-2: A single tertiary care center experience from a developing country.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022Article
- Potential Cardiotoxic Effects of Remdesivir on Cardiovascular System: A Literature Review.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2022Review
- Molecular Insights of SARS-CoV-2 Antivirals Administration: A Balance between Safety Profiles and Impact on Cardiovascular Phenotypes.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- The COVID-19 Patient in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2022Review
- Scoping insight on antiviral drugs against COVID-19.Arabian journal of chemistry · 2021Review
- Article
- Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Strategies and the Potential Role of miRNA in the Assessment of COVID-19 Morbidity, Recurrence, and Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Enhancing Pharmacovigilance from the US Experience: Current Practices and Future Opportunities.Drug safety · 2021Review
- Clinical studies assessing the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of remdesivir in management of COVID-19: A scoping review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Article
- Review of registered clinical trials for the treatment of COVID-19.Drug development research · 2021Review
- Cost-effectiveness of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone for COVID-19 Treatment in South Africa.Open forum infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Remdesivir use in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A mini-review.Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere is a need to identify effective, safe treatments for COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) rapidly, given the current, ongoing pandemic. A systematic benefit-risk assessment was designed and conducted to examine the benefit-risk profile of remdesivir in COVID-19 patients compared with standard of care, placebo or other treatments. A key objective of this study was to provide a platform for a dynamic systematic benefit-risk evaluation, which starts with inevitably limited information (to meet the urgent unmet public health need worldwide), then update the benefit-risk evaluation as more data become available.
methodsThe Benefit-Risk Action Team (BRAT) framework was used to assess the overall benefit-risk of the use of remdesivir as a treatment for COVID-19 compared with standard of care, placebo or other treatments. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar and government agency websites to identify literature reporting clinical outcomes in patients taking remdesivir for COVID-19. A value tree was constructed and key benefits and risks were ranked by two clinicians in order of considered importance.
resultsUsing the BRAT method, several key benefits and risks for use of remdesivir in COVID-19 compared with placebo have been identified. In one trial, the benefit of time to clinical improvement was not statistically significant (21 vs 23 days, HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.87-1.75), although the study was underpowered. In another trial, a shorter time to recovery in patients treated with remdesivir was observed (11 vs 15 days), with non-significant reduced mortality risk (8% vs 12%). Risk data were only available from one trial. This trial reported fewer serious adverse events in patients taking remdesivir (18%) compared with the placebo group (26%); however, more patients in the remdesivir group discontinued treatment as a result of an adverse event compared with those patients receiving placebo (12% vs 5%).
conclusionsPreliminary clinical trial results suggest that there may be a favourable benefit-risk profile for remdesivir compared with placebo in severe COVID-19 infection and further data on benefits would strengthen this evaluation. There is limited safety data for remdesivir, which should be obtained in further studies. The current framework summarises the key anticipated benefits and risks for which further data are needed. Ongoing clinical trial data can be incorporated into the framework when available to provide an updated benefit-risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.