Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32468196›Full record

SynthesisDrug safety2020

Remdesivir in Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Benefit-Risk Assessment.

Miranda Davies, Vicki Osborne, Samantha Lane, Debabrata Roy, Sandeep Dhanda, Alison Evans, Saad Shakir

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04560231 (Is Remdesivir a Possible Therapeutic Option for SARS-CoV-2), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04560231 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this map

Is Remdesivir a Possible Therapeutic Option for SARS-CoV-2 : An Interventional Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLahore General HospitalRan2020 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsSARS-CoV InfectionArmsRemdesivir
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Remdesivir in COVID-19: pros and cons.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The COVID-19 Patient in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  13. Scoping insight on antiviral drugs against COVID-19.Arabian journal of chemistry · 2021
    Review
  14. Molecular biology research communications · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Remdesivir use in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A mini-review.Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miranda DaviesDrug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Blundell Lane, Southampton, SO31 1AA, UK. miranda.davies@dsru.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2949-8378
Vicki OsborneDrug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Blundell Lane, Southampton, SO31 1AA, UK.
Samantha LaneDrug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Blundell Lane, Southampton, SO31 1AA, UK.
Debabrata RoyDrug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Blundell Lane, Southampton, SO31 1AA, UK.
Sandeep DhandaDrug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Blundell Lane, Southampton, SO31 1AA, UK.
Alison EvansDrug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Blundell Lane, Southampton, SO31 1AA, UK.
Saad ShakirDrug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Blundell Lane, Southampton, SO31 1AA, UK.
Drug Safety Research Unit · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a need to identify effective, safe treatments for COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) rapidly, given the current, ongoing pandemic. A systematic benefit-risk assessment was designed and conducted to examine the benefit-risk profile of remdesivir in COVID-19 patients compared with standard of care, placebo or other treatments. A key objective of this study was to provide a platform for a dynamic systematic benefit-risk evaluation, which starts with inevitably limited information (to meet the urgent unmet public health need worldwide), then update the benefit-risk evaluation as more data become available.

methodsThe Benefit-Risk Action Team (BRAT) framework was used to assess the overall benefit-risk of the use of remdesivir as a treatment for COVID-19 compared with standard of care, placebo or other treatments. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar and government agency websites to identify literature reporting clinical outcomes in patients taking remdesivir for COVID-19. A value tree was constructed and key benefits and risks were ranked by two clinicians in order of considered importance.

resultsUsing the BRAT method, several key benefits and risks for use of remdesivir in COVID-19 compared with placebo have been identified. In one trial, the benefit of time to clinical improvement was not statistically significant (21 vs 23 days, HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.87-1.75), although the study was underpowered. In another trial, a shorter time to recovery in patients treated with remdesivir was observed (11 vs 15 days), with non-significant reduced mortality risk (8% vs 12%). Risk data were only available from one trial. This trial reported fewer serious adverse events in patients taking remdesivir (18%) compared with the placebo group (26%); however, more patients in the remdesivir group discontinued treatment as a result of an adverse event compared with those patients receiving placebo (12% vs 5%).

conclusionsPreliminary clinical trial results suggest that there may be a favourable benefit-risk profile for remdesivir compared with placebo in severe COVID-19 infection and further data on benefits would strengthen this evaluation. There is limited safety data for remdesivir, which should be obtained in further studies. The current framework summarises the key anticipated benefits and risks for which further data are needed. Ongoing clinical trial data can be incorporated into the framework when available to provide an updated benefit-risk assessment.

Indexed as

Adenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRisk AssessmentSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral Agentsremdesivir

Identifiers

PMID32468196
PMCPMC7255634
OpenAlexW3028772421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.