ReviewHerz2021
Transcatheter therapies for severe tricuspid regurgitation. Quo vadis?
Review in Herz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining the forgotten valve: outcomes of tricuspid valve surgery, a 15-year experience.Irish journal of medical science · 2022Article
- Macrophage-extracellular matrix interactions: Perspectives for tissue engineered heart valve remodeling.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is common and is associated with a poor prognosis. To date, most patients are undertreated; therefore, transcatheter options could be clinically impactful in those who are denied surgery. Several transcatheter solutions have been developed that address the problem via leaflet enhancement, annuloplasty, or heterotopic implantation of self-expandable or balloon-expandable valves in the caval veins. A comprehensive patient evaluation, based on multimodality imaging techniques for a better understanding of the valvular pathology and TR mechanism, remains paramount for an appropriate device selection. To date, several trials have shown the feasibility and safety of a multitude of devices in this setting, but data from randomized clinical trials regarding clinical benefit based on hard endpoints are still lacking. Although the optimal patient profile and timing of intervention remain under investigation, data from available studies indicate that an earlier treatment referral, before onset of irreversible right ventricular remodeling, could be beneficial. This review discusses the present landscape and future implications of transcatheter therapies for severe TR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.