Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32468119›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2020

Wearable sensors can reliably quantify gait alterations associated with disability in people with progressive multiple sclerosis in a clinical setting.

Lorenza Angelini, William Hodgkinson, Craig Smith, Jessie Moorman Dodd, Basil Sharrack, Claudia Mazzà, David Paling

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. A smartphone sensor-based digital outcome assessment of multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sensors in Multiple Sclerosis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Wearable Gait Monitoring System for 17 Gait Parameters Based on Computer Vision.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenza AngeliniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Insigneo Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Pam Liversidge Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK. L.Angelini@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4763-7717
William HodgkinsonMedical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Craig SmithMedical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jessie Moorman DoddMedical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Basil SharrackAcademic Department of Neuroscience, Sheffield NIHR Neuroscience BRC, Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Claudia MazzàDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Insigneo Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Pam Liversidge Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK.
David PalingSheffield Institute of Translational Neuroscience, Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
University of Sheffield · GBInsigneo · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and EFPIA via the Innovative Medicine Initiative 2 IMI22017-13-7-820820NIHR through the Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre IS-BRC-1215-20017UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Multisim) EP/K03877X/1UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Multisim2) EP/S032940/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait disability in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) is difficult to quantify using existing clinical tools. This study aims to identify reliable and objective gait-based biomarkers to monitor progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) in clinical settings. During routine clinical visits, 57 people with secondary progressive MS and 24 healthy controls walked for 6 minutes wearing three inertial motion sensors. Fifteen gait measures were computed from the sensor data and tested for between-session reliability, for differences between controls and people with moderate and severe MS disability, and for correlation with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. The majority of gait measures showed good to excellent between-session reliability when assessed in a subgroup of 23 healthy controls and 25 people with MS. These measures showed that people with MS walked with significantly longer step and stride durations, reduced step and stride regularity, and experienced difficulties in controlling and maintaining a stable walk when compared to controls. These abnormalities significantly increased in people with a higher level of disability and correlated with their EDSS scores. Reliable and objective gait-based biomarkers using wearable sensors have been identified. These biomarkers may allow clinicians to quantify clinically relevant alterations in gait in people with progressive MS within the context of regular clinical visits.

Indexed as

GaitMultiple SclerosisSexual and Gender MinoritiesWearable Electronic DevicesDisability EvaluationFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsBalanceGait analysisRegularitySix-minute walkTemporal parametersTest-retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID32468119
PMCPMC7501113
OpenAlexW3029517753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.