ArticlePsychopharmacology2020
Hold-down as an alternative to unit dose in cocaine self-administration experiments: Characterization using a progressive ratio schedule.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using miniscopes and deep learning to compare neurobehavioral representations of psychostimulant and opioid self-administration.Addiction neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleVirtually all cocaine self-administration studies have used a "unit dose" as a reinforcing stimulus; the subject is a passive recipient of an experimenter-selected dose.
objectivesThe present experiments examined the consequence of requiring the subject to actively determine the dose and speed of each injection.
methodsA two-lever procedure was used in which responding on a progressive ratio (PR) schedule provided access to cocaine on a hold down (HD) schedule. With HD, the pump is turned on for the duration that the lever is held down, thus the dose and speed of injection is determined by the behavior of the subject. The procedure allows for the evaluation of both drug taking and drug seeking responses.
resultsThe results were qualitatively different from PR self-administration studies using unit dose. The self-administered HD dose varied across the session; the self-administered dose was found to inversely correlate with drug levels at the time of access. Importantly, the 2 L-PR-HD procedure identified a subpopulation of subjects that showed extremes in both drug seeking and drug taking. Subjects at the top end of the distribution displayed unprecedented final ratios (> 900) and rapidly self-administered very large doses (> 1.4 mg; ~ 4.2 mg/kg). Manipulation of drug-taking variables (HD access duration and concentration of drug in the pump) showed that the immediacy of a cocaine bolus, not the duration of access, is the major determinant of drug seeking.
conclusionsIncorporating a consummatory response into a PR procedure provides a unique perspective on the interactions of drug-seeking and drug-taking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.