ArticleIntensive care medicine2020
Epidemiology and patient predictors of infection and sepsis in the prehospital setting.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A nomogram to predict prolonged stay of obesity patients with sepsis in ICU: Relevancy for predictive, personalized, preventive, and participatory healthcare strategies.Frontiers in public health · 2022Trial
- Early Identification of Sepsis by Emergency Medical Services: Diagnostic Accuracy of Scoring Systems in a Retrospective Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Prediction of infection in the emergency department-a machine learning model.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Prehospital antibiotics and intravenous fluids for patients with sepsis: protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Interpretive machine learning predicts short-term mortality risk in elderly sepsis patients.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Construction and efficacy evaluation of a model for early diagnosis of pediatric sepsis based on LASSO-logistic regression.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- The performance of screening tools and use of blood analyses in prehospital identification of sepsis patients and patients suitable for non-conveyance - an observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Observational
- Article
- Nomogram predictive model for in-hospital mortality risk in elderly ICU patients with urosepsis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Ultra-Short-Course Antibiotics for Suspected Pneumonia With Preserved Oxygenation.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Article
- Pre-hospital Prognostic Factors of 30-Day Survival in Sepsis Patients; a Retrospective Cohort Study.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Prognosis in Sepsis: A Discovery and Validation Study.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeParamedics are often the first healthcare contact for patients with infection and sepsis and may identify them earlier with improved knowledge of the clinical signs and symptoms that identify patients at higher risk.
methodsA 1-year (April 2015 and March 2016) cohort of all adult patients transported by EMS in the province of Alberta, Canada, was linked to hospital administrative databases. The main outcomes were infection, or sepsis diagnosis among patients with infection, in the Emergency Department. We estimated the probability of these outcomes, conditional on signs and symptoms that are commonly available to paramedics.
resultsAmong 131,745 patients transported by EMS, the prevalence of infection was 9.7% and sepsis was 2.1%. The in-hospital mortality rate for patients with sepsis was 28%. The majority (62%) of patients with infections were classified by one of three dispatch categories ("breathing problems," "sick patient," or "inter-facility transfer"), and the probability of infection diagnosis was 17-20% for patients within these categories. Patients with elevated temperature measurements had the highest probability for infection diagnosis, but altered Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), low blood pressure, or abnormal respiratory rate had the highest probability for sepsis diagnosis.
conclusionDispatch categories and elevated temperature identify patients with higher probability of infection, but abnormal GCS, low blood pressure, and abnormal respiratory rate identify patients with infection who have a higher probability of sepsis. These characteristics may be considered by paramedics to identify higher-risk patients prior to arrival at the hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.