Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32468081›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2020

Exposure-response analysis of endoxifen serum concentrations in early-breast cancer.

Anabel Beatriz Sanchez-Spitman, Dirk-Jan A R Moes, Jesse J Swen, Vincent O Dezentjé, Diether Lambrechts, Patrick Neven, Hans Gelderblom, Henk-Jan Guchelaar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Precision Dosing of Targeted Therapies Is Ready for Prime Time.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. ClinicalCancers · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anabel Beatriz Sanchez-SpitmanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2073-5648
Dirk-Jan A R MoesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jesse J SwenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vincent O DezentjéDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Diether LambrechtsCenter for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium.
Patrick NevenDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hans GelderblomLeiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Henk-Jan GuchelaarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. h.j.guchelaar@lumc.nl.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLKU Leuven · BEThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLVIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTamoxifen is part of endocrine therapy in breast cancer treatment. Studies have indicated the use of endoxifen concentrations, tamoxifen active metabolite, to guide tamoxifen efficacy. Three endoxifen thresholds have been suggested (5.9 ng/ml, 5.2 ng/ml and 3.3 ng/ml) for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Our aim was to validate these thresholds and to examine endoxifen exposure with clinical outcome in early-breast cancer patients using tamoxifen.

methodsData from 667 patients from the CYPTAM study (NTR1509) were available. Patients were stratified (above or below), according to the endoxifen threshold values for tamoxifen efficacy and tested by Cox regression. Logistic regressions to estimate the probability of relapse and tamoxifen discontinuation were performed.

resultsNone of the thresholds showed a statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival: 5.2 ng/ml threshold: hazard ratio (HR): 2.545, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.912-7.096, p value: 0.074; 3.3 ng/ml threshold: HR: 0.728; 95% CI 0.421-1.258, p value: 0.255. Logistic regression did not show a statistically significant association between the risk of relapse (odds ratio (OR): 0.971 (95% CI 0.923-1.021, p value: 0.248) and the risk for tamoxifen discontinuation (OR: 1.006 95% CI 0.961-1.053, p value: 0.798) with endoxifen concentrations.

conclusionOur findings do not confirm the endoxifen threshold values for TDM nor does it allow definition of a novel threshold. These findings indicate a limited value of TDM to guide tamoxifen efficacy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsDrug MonitoringFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesSurvival RateTamoxifen4-hydroxy-N-desmethyltamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalTamoxifenBreast cancerClinical outcomeEndoxifenTamoxifenTDM

Identifiers

PMID32468081
PMCPMC7305085
OpenAlexW3029008153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.