Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32467911›Full record

ArticleFungal systematics and evolution2019

Neotypification of

L Lombard, R van Doorn, P W Crous

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal systematics and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identification and Characterization of PathogenicJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An integrative re-evaluation of theStudies in mycology · 2025
    Article
  6. Three new species ofMycoKeys · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Studies in mycology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Identification and Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Persoonia · 2022
    Article
  16. Fungal systematics and evolution · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Studies in mycology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L LombardWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 85176, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
R van DoornWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 85176, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
P W CrousWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 85176, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

chlamydosporesclinical isolatesmorphologymycotoxinnew taxasystematics

Identifiers

PMID32467911
PMCPMC7241675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.