ArticleCurrent developmental disorders reports2019
Assessment and Management of Tic Disorders in Pediatric Primary Care Settings.
Article in Current developmental disorders reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges in studying disparities in neuropsychiatric hyperkinetic movement disorders.Current opinion in neurology · 2025Review
- A teaching tool for tic disorders: using "disinhibition" to unify the spectrum.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Automated Quantification of Eye Tics Using Computer Vision and Deep Learning Techniques.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2024Article
- Scoping Review of Multidisciplinary Care in Tourette Syndrome.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2023Article
- Successful Treatment of Tourette Syndrome With a Combination of Guanfacine and Aripiprazole: A Case Series.Cureus · 2023Article
- Brief youth self-report screener for tics: Can a subscale of the Motor tic, Obsession and compulsion, and Vocal tic Evaluation Survey (MOVES) identify tic disorders in youth?Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health · 2023Article
- Tourette Syndrome Treatment Updates: a Review and Discussion of the Current and Upcoming Literature.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022Review
- Using Online Support Communities for Tourette Syndrome and Tic Disorders: Online Survey of Users' Experiences.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Health Care Providers' Attitudes and Knowledge Related to Tic Disorder Identification and Treatment.Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewPediatricians and other primary care providers are often the first and sole healthcare clinicians of patients who present with tics. However, limited primary care pediatric training in neuropsychiatric concerns, as well as perceived lack of comfort and preparation, make it challenging for these clinicians to confidently identify and manage tic disorders. RECENT
findingsCurrent empirical findings of tic disorder management relevant to pediatric physicians, including assessment, psychoeducation, behavioral interventions, psychotropic medications, and alternative treatments are reviewed. SUMMARY: This article discusses neuropsychiatric and medical complexities of tic disorder assessment, with particular emphasis on differential and comorbid diagnoses. Tiered referral recommendations, based on symptom severity, impairment, and consideration of comorbid conditions, are provided. Future directions for tic management, including dissemination of evidence-based treatments of tic disorders and multidisciplinary teams within pediatric primary care settings, are included.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.