ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Functional outcomes comparative analysis of cemented and uncemented total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of postoperative blood loss in cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Pooled it
- No Blood Loss Increase in Cementless vs. Cemented Fixation Following Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matching Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Study Detailed Bone Apposition and Fixation of Cementless Knee System Compared to Cemented Total Knee Replacements.Arthroplasty today · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCementless knee arthroplasty becomes more and more popular worldwide. At the beginning of endoprosthetics era, cementless implants showed unsatisfactory results. However, surgical technologies develop rapidly and nowadays the cementless fixation shows better outcomes.
objectivesTo analyze the experience of total knee arthroplasty using cementless fixation for the treatment of advanced arthritis of the knee.
methodsWe operated on 130 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 36 months. In 70 patients we used cementless fixation and in 60 patients we used implants with cemented fixation. To evaluate the results, we used KOOS scale and WOMAC scale. We also evaluated the mean duration of surgical intervention and blood loss.
resultsIn the cementless group WOMAC and KOOS scales scores before the operation were 198,2 (±35.7) and 23,1 (±3.4), respectively, and in the cemented group it was 199.3(±36.8) and 24.9 (±2.1), respectively(p > 0,05). One year after the operation, KOOS and WOMAC scores were 54.5(±12.6) and 83.6(±8,.2) in the cementless group and 78.9(±4.6) and 66.9(±5.7) in the cemented group(p < 0,05)., respectively. Intraoperative blood loss was 255(±89,3) in the cemented group and 315(±52,1) in cementless group(p < 0,05). Postoperative blood loss was 515(±119, 5) and 440(±129,3)) (p < 0,05), respectively. Mean duration of intervention was 78 min (±6,8) in cemented group and 64 min (±8,7) in cementless group(p < 0,05).
conclusions1We have better functional results using implants with cementless fixation.2There was a greater intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in cementless group.3Cementless knee arthroplasty associated with shorter duration of intervention than cemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.