ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Complications of surgical approaches for stabilization of pelvic ring injuries: Analysis of pitfalls and how to avoid them.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Arterial angioembolisation versus pre-peritoneal pelvic packing in haemodynamically unstable patients with complex pelvic fractures: a meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Pooled it
- Complication rates following open surgical removal of osteosynthesis material from the pelvis and acetabulum: a retrospective case series of 154 removals.Acta orthopaedica · 2026Article
- The use of a curved internal fixation device in adult pelvic Fractures: Short-Term clinical outcomes in high and low energy fractures.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Different coupling mechanisms for a novel modular plate in acetabular fractures-a comparison using a laparoscopic model.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic-ring-injuries are bony and/or ligamentous disruptions that might lead to pelvic instabilities and asymmetries. For surgical treatment, knowledge of the different possible approaches and stabilization-techniques is essential. From 2003 to 2017, we analyzed all complications in operative and non-operative treatment of pelvic-ring-injuries in our institution. Besides complication rates, we describe the reachable anatomical structures for different surgical approaches to the pelvic-ring focusing on strategies to reduce surgical complications. Of 1848 patients with a pelvic fracture, 1463 patients had a pelvic-ring-fracture. We found an overall complication-rate of 14.4%. For reducing approach-related morbidity, preoperative planning and knowledge of approach-related complications is important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.