Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32467649›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2020

The quest to slow ageing through drug discovery.

Linda Partridge, Matias Fuentealba, Brian K Kennedy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 257 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
257citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
27.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

257 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 459 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Hallmarks of Aging: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Vascular Aging.Circulation · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational

197 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Linda PartridgeMax Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Department Biological Mechanisms of Ageing, Cologne, Germany. linda.partridge@age.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9615-0094
Matias FuentealbaInstitute of Healthy Ageing, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.
Brian K KennedyDepartment of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. bkennedy@nus.edu.sg.
Buck Institute for Research on Aging · USMax Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing · DEMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although death is inevitable, individuals have long sought to alter the course of the ageing process. Indeed, ageing has proved to be modifiable; by intervening in biological systems, such as nutrient sensing, cellular senescence, the systemic environment and the gut microbiome, phenotypes of ageing can be slowed sufficiently to mitigate age-related functional decline. These interventions can also delay the onset of many disabling, chronic diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disease and neurodegeneration, in animal models. Here, we examine the most promising interventions to slow ageing and group them into two tiers based on the robustness of the preclinical, and some clinical, results, in which the top tier includes rapamycin, senolytics, metformin, acarbose, spermidine, NAD

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAgingAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID32467649
OpenAlexW3029220716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.