Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32467590›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2020

3' MACE RNA-sequencing allows for transcriptome profiling in human tissue samples after long-term storage.

Stefaniya Boneva, Anja Schlecht, Daniel Böhringer, Hans Mittelviefhaus, Thomas Reinhard, Hansjürgen Agostini, Claudia Auw-Haedrich, Günther Schlunck, Julian Wolf, Clemens Lange

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefaniya BonevaEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9811-2160
Anja SchlechtEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Daniel BöhringerEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Hans MittelviefhausEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas ReinhardEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Hansjürgen AgostiniEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Claudia Auw-HaedrichEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Günther SchlunckEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Julian Wolf *Eye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-9697
Clemens Lange *Eye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. clemens.lange@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-6823
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to compare the potential of standard RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) and 3' massive analysis of c-DNA ends (MACE) RNA-sequencing for the analysis of fresh tissue and describes transcriptome profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) archival human samples by MACE. To compare MACE to standard RNA-Seq on fresh tissue, four healthy conjunctiva from four subjects were collected during vitreoretinal surgery, halved and immediately transferred to RNA lysis buffer without prior fixation and then processed for either standard RNA-Seq or MACE RNA-Seq analysis. To assess the impact of FFPE preparation on MACE, a third part was fixed in formalin and processed for paraffin embedding, and its transcriptional profile was compared with the unfixed specimens analyzed by MACE. To investigate the impact of FFPE storage time on MACE results, 24 FFPE-treated conjunctival samples from 24 patients were analyzed as well. Nineteen thousand six hundred fifty-nine transcribed genes were detected by both MACE and standard RNA-Seq on fresh tissue, while 3251 and 2213 transcripts were identified explicitly by MACE or RNA-Seq, respectively. Standard RNA-Seq tended to yield longer detected transcripts more often than MACE technology despite normalization, indicating that the MACE technology is less susceptible to a length bias. FFPE processing revealed negligible effects on MACE sequencing results. Several quality-control measurements showed that long-term storage in paraffin did not decrease the diversity of MACE libraries. We noted a nonlinear relation between storage time and the number of raw reads with an accelerated decrease within the first 1000 days in paraffin, while the numbers remained relatively stable in older samples. Interestingly, the number of transcribed genes detected was independent on FFPE storage time. RNA of sufficient quality and quantity can be extracted from FFPE samples to obtain comprehensive transcriptome profiling using MACE technology. We thus present MACE as a novel opportunity for utilizing FFPE samples stored in histological archives.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingTissue PreservationDNA, ComplementaryHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisParaffin EmbeddingRNA-SeqTime FactorsTissue FixationDNA, Complementary

Identifiers

PMID32467590
PMCPMC7498368
OpenAlexW3029377884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.