Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32467409›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2020

Fecal DNA Testing of TWIST1 Methylation Identifies Patients With Advanced Colorectal Adenoma Missed by Fecal Immunochemical Test for Hemoglobin.

Yutaka Suehiro, Shinichi Hashimoto, Atsushi Goto, Yuko Yamaoka, Naoki Yamamoto, Nobuaki Suzuki, Shingo Higaki, Ikuei Fujii, Chieko Suzuki, Toshihiko Matsumoto and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yutaka SuehiroDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Shinichi HashimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Atsushi GotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Yuko YamaokaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Naoki YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Nobuaki SuzukiDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Shingo HigakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, St. Hill Hospital, Ube, Japan.
Ikuei FujiiAjisu Kyoritsu Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Chieko SuzukiAjisu Kyoritsu Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Toshihiko MatsumotoDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Tomomi HoshidaDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Michiko KogaDivision of Infectious Diseases, The Advanced Clinical Research Center, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeya TsutsumiDivision of Infectious Diseases, The Advanced Clinical Research Center, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Lay Ahyoung LimDepartment of General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuo MatsubaraDepartment of General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Taro TakamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Shin YoshidaDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Shoichi HazamaDepartment of Translational Research and Developmental Therapeutics against Cancer, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Hiroshi YotsuyanagiDivision of Infectious Diseases, The Advanced Clinical Research Center, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroaki NaganoDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Isao SakaidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Takahiro YamasakiDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Yamaguchi University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPHiroshima Kyoritsu Hospital · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe have reported previously that fecal DNA testing of TWIST1 methylation in combination with the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT) (combination test) is useful for colorectal neoplasia screening. In this study, using larger sample sizes, we studied the clinical performance of the combination test for the detection of colorectal neoplasia and, especially, advanced colorectal adenoma.

methodsWe performed a prospective study in which FIT, fecal DNA testing of TWIST1 methylation, and colonoscopy were performed on 372 patients with colorectal neoplasia and 71 subjects without colorectal neoplasia. We assessed the individual clinical performance of each of FIT and fecal DNA testing of TWIST1 methylation and of the combination test for the detection of colorectal neoplasia including advanced adenoma based on morphologic subtypes.

resultsThe FIT alone had a sensitivity of 7.5% (3/40) for nonadvanced adenoma, 32.3% (41/127) for advanced adenoma, and 93.7% (192/205) for colorectal cancer and a specificity of 87.3% (62/71). The combination test had a sensitivity of 35.0% (14/40) for nonadvanced adenoma, 68.5% (87/127) for advanced adenoma, and 95.6% (196/205) for colorectal cancer and a specificity of 80.3% (57/71). For morphological subtypes of advanced adenoma, the sensitivity of FIT was only 28.2% (20/71) for polypoid type and 16.1% (5/31) for nonpolypoid type, whereas the combination test increased the sensitivities to 64.8% (46/71) and 71.0% (22/31), respectively. DISCUSSION: The combination of the fecal DNA test with FIT seemed to be useful to detect colorectal neoplasia and, especially, advanced adenoma of the nonpolypoid type.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDNADNA MethylationFecesFemaleHemoglobinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNuclear ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorDNAHemoglobinsNuclear ProteinsTWIST1 protein, humanTwist-Related Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID32467409
PMCPMC7339193
OpenAlexW3032787129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.