Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32467252›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Public satisfaction with the healthcare system in China during 2013-2015: a cross-sectional survey of the associated factors.

Jing Hua Zhang, Xinxin Peng, Chengkun Liu, Yijun Chen, Hongmin Zhang, Ojo Olukayode Iwaloye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jing Hua ZhangSchool of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao, China jhuzhang@must.edu.mo.ORCID 0000-0001-8213-4536
Xinxin PengSchool of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao, China.
Chengkun LiuSchool of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao, China.
Yijun ChenSchool of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao, China.
Hongmin ZhangSchool of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao, China.
Ojo Olukayode IwaloyeSchool of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe explore how public satisfaction with the healthcare system in China varies with social and economic factors, especially regional variations and changes during 2013-2015.

designPopulation-based, cross-sectional survey performed between July 2013 and July 2015.

settingGeneral population of China during 2013-2015.

participantsA total of 15 969 participants (women=49.4%, sample-weighted average age=51.9). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Public satisfaction with the healthcare system, defined as 'being satisfied' if a respondent's satisfaction score is ≥70 points.

resultsThe 2-year mean of the satisfaction score of the sample is 68.5 out of 100 points and the score in 2015 is higher than 2013 by 3.5 points. Senior respondents (OR=1.19, p<0.001), rural respondents (OR=1.23, p=0.009) and those with higher socioeconomic status are more likely to report being satisfied. Internal migrants (OR=0.75, p<0.001) and those with a higher level of education are less likely to report being satisfied. Total health expenditure as percentage of gross domestic product and density of hospital beds have a significantly positive association with satisfaction (OR=1.13, p<0.001). Meanwhile, the government's share in total healthcare expenditures has a moderately negative association with satisfaction (OR=0.97, p<0.001). In rural areas, the density of hospital beds has a positive association with satisfaction (OR=1.26, p=0.002). The Northeast region and Shanghai (OR=0.49, p<0.001; OR=0.71, p=0.034) are less likely to report being satisfied and this remained unchanged in 2015.

conclusionThere are considerable disparities in public satisfaction with the healthcare system in China, associated with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, regional locations, urban-rural environment, and regional health resource abundance. Actions are recommended to improve satisfaction with the public healthcare system, especially in the Northeast region of China.

Indexed as

Personal SatisfactionChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Care ReformHealth ExpendituresHumansMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationSocioeconomic Factorshealth policyhealth system in Chinapublic satisfactionrural health

Identifiers

PMID32467252
PMCPMC7259843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.