Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32467237›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2020

Canonical Notch signaling controls the early thymic epithelial progenitor cell state and emergence of the medullary epithelial lineage in fetal thymus development.

Dong Liu, Anastasia I Kousa, Kathy E O'Neill, Paul Rouse, Martyna Popis, Alison M Farley, Simon R Tomlinson, Svetlana Ulyanchenko, Francois Guillemot, Philip A Seymour and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perspectives on the Parathyroid-Thymus Interconnection-A Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Thymus Ontogeny and Development.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Generation and repair of thymic epithelial cells.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Generation and repair of thymic epithelial cells.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Aire in Autoimmunity.Annual review of immunology · 2024
    Review
  12. Aire in Autoimmunity.Annual review of immunology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Embryonic keratin19Nature communications · 2023
    Article
  16. Notch Partners in the Long Journey of T-ALL Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Generation of functional human thymic cells from induced pluripotent stem cells.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dong LiuMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, 5, Little France Drive, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK.
Anastasia I KousaMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, 5, Little France Drive, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK.
Kathy E O'NeillMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, 5, Little France Drive, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK.
Paul RouseMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, 5, Little France Drive, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK.
Martyna PopisMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, 5, Little France Drive, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK.
Alison M FarleyMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, 5, Little France Drive, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK.
Simon R TomlinsonMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, 5, Little France Drive, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK.
Svetlana UlyanchenkoBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3124-9178
Francois GuillemotThe Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Philip A SeymourNNF Center for Stem Cell Biology, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Alle 14, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5782-6020
Mette C JørgensenNNF Center for Stem Cell Biology, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Alle 14, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Palle SerupNNF Center for Stem Cell Biology, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Alle 14, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0858-590X
Ute KochEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Freddy RadtkeEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
C Clare BlackburnMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, 5, Little France Drive, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK c.blackburn@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6326-640X
MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H021183/1Medical Research Council MR/K017047/1Wellcome Trust 211944/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thymus function depends on the epithelial compartment of the thymic stroma. Cortical thymic epithelial cells (cTECs) regulate T cell lineage commitment and positive selection, while medullary (m) TECs impose central tolerance on the T cell repertoire. During thymus organogenesis, these functionally distinct sub-lineages are thought to arise from a common thymic epithelial progenitor cell (TEPC). However, the mechanisms controlling cTEC and mTEC production from the common TEPC are not understood. Here, we show that emergence of the earliest mTEC lineage-restricted progenitors requires active NOTCH signaling in progenitor TEC and that, once specified, further mTEC development is NOTCH independent. In addition, we demonstrate that persistent NOTCH activity favors maintenance of undifferentiated TEPCs at the expense of cTEC differentiation. Finally, we uncover a cross-regulatory relationship between NOTCH and FOXN1, a master regulator of TEC differentiation. These data establish NOTCH as a potent regulator of TEPC and mTEC fate during fetal thymus development, and are thus of high relevance to strategies aimed at generating/regenerating functional thymic tissue

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageEmbryonic DevelopmentEpithelial CellsFemaleForkhead Transcription FactorsGain of Function MutationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalImmunoglobulin J Recombination Signal Sequence-Binding ProteinMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutNF-kappa BOrganogenesisForkhead Transcription FactorsImmunoglobulin J Recombination Signal Sequence-Binding ProteinNF-kappa BRbpj protein, mouseReceptors, NotchWhn proteinCell fate regulationDifferentiationLineage divergenceNotch signalingProgenitor cellStem cellThymic epithelial cellThymus

Identifiers

PMID32467237
PMCPMC7328009
OpenAlexW3031266716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.