Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32467180›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2020

Long-Term Outcomes of the WEB Device for Treatment of Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysms.

M Fujimoto, I Lylyk, C Bleise, P Albiña, J Chudyk, P Lylyk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Long-term outcomes of the Woven EndoBridge device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Aneurysmal recurrence and retreatment modalities after Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ClippingInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. WEB vs coiling in ruptured aneurysms: A propensity score matched comparison of safety and efficacy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Long-term efficacy and safety of WovenEndoBridge (WEB)-assisted cerebral aneurysm embolization.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Will Coiling Survive through the Next Decade?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

M FujimotoFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (M.F.), Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan michio1974111@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1752-7744
I LylykClinica Sagrada Familia (M.F., I.L., C.B., J.C., P.L.), ENERI, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-6048-4225
C BleiseClinica Sagrada Familia (M.F., I.L., C.B., J.C., P.L.), ENERI, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-2292-3263
P AlbiñaDepartment of Neurosurgery (P.A.), Hospital Barros Luco Trudeau, University of Santiago, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-0434-5466
J ChudykClinica Sagrada Familia (M.F., I.L., C.B., J.C., P.L.), ENERI, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-2551-5169
P LylykClinica Sagrada Familia (M.F., I.L., C.B., J.C., P.L.), ENERI, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-7044-4369
Clínica Sagrada Esperança · AOHospital Barros Luco-Trudeau · CLKawasaki Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTreatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms using endovascular therapy is still challenging even with the development of treatment devices. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with a Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients treated with a WEB device at our institution between May 2009 and November 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical and imaging evaluation, aneurysm occlusion status, and modified Rankin scale score were analyzed 1 day after treatment and in the short- (<6 months), mid- (<24 months), and long-term (>24 months) follow-up periods.

resultsForty-one cases of wide-neck aneurysms were analyzed in this study. Overall, 78.8% of the aneurysms had complete occlusion in the last follow-up, and 19.5% required retreatment with additional endovascular devices. A good clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale: 0-2) was obtained in 95.1% of the patients, and the overall treatment-related morbidity and mortality rates were 2.4% and 0.0%, respectively. The mean follow-up time was 15.3 ± 13.5 months.

conclusionsThe results obtained in this study suggest that treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms with a WEB device is feasible with an acceptable safety and efficacy rate.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisAdultAgedEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32467180
PMCPMC7342766
OpenAlexW3031064818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.