Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32466772›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2020

Molecular delimitation of European leafy liverworts of the genus Calypogeia based on plastid super-barcodes.

Monika Ślipiko, Kamil Myszczyński, Katarzyna Buczkowska, Alina Bączkiewicz, Monika Szczecińska, Jakub Sawicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Complete chloroplast genomes of threeFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. The Content of Volatile Organic Compounds inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Complete chloroplast genomes of 11Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  20. Phylogenomics and Genetic Diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monika ŚlipikoDepartment of Botany and Nature Protection, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland. monika.slipiko@uwm.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7759-2193
Kamil MyszczyńskiDepartment of Botany and Nature Protection, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.
Katarzyna BuczkowskaDepartment of Biology, Institute of Experimental Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poznań, Poland.
Alina BączkiewiczDepartment of Biology, Institute of Experimental Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poznań, Poland.
Monika SzczecińskaDepartment of Botany and Nature Protection, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.
Jakub SawickiDepartment of Botany and Nature Protection, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.

Funding

The National Science Center Kraków, Poland No.2015/19/B/NZ8/03970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecular research revealed that some of the European Calypogeia species described on the basis of morphological criteria are genetically heterogeneous and, in fact, are species complexes. DNA barcoding is already commonly used for correct identification of difficult to determine species, to disclose cryptic species, or detecting new taxa. Among liverworts, some DNA fragments, recommend as universal plant DNA barcodes, cause problems in amplification. Super-barcoding based on genomic data, makes new opportunities in a species identification.

resultsOn the basis of 22 individuals, representing 10 Calypogeia species, plastid genome was tested as a super-barcode. It is not effective in 100%, nonetheless its success of species discrimination (95.45%) is still conspicuous. It is not excluded that the above outcome may have been upset by cryptic speciation in C. suecica, as our results indicate. Having the sequences of entire plastomes of European Calypogeia species, we also discovered that the ndhB and ndhH genes and the trnT-trnL spacer identify species in 100%.

conclusionsThis study shows that even if a super-barcoding is not effective in 100%, this method does not close the door to a traditional single- or multi-locus barcoding. Moreover, it avoids many complication resulting from the need to amplify selected DNA fragments. It seems that a good solution for species discrimination is a development of so-called "specific barcodes" for a given taxonomic group, based on plastome data.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, PlantGenes, PlantGenome, ChloroplastHepatophytaPhylogenyPlastidsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA, PlantCalypogeiaDNA barcodendhBndhHSuper-barcodingtrnT-trnL

Identifiers

PMID32466772
PMCPMC7257191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.