Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32466662›Full record

ArticleAstrobiology2020

Mars Extant Life: What's Next? Conference Report.

B L Carrier, D W Beaty, M A Meyer, J G Blank, L Chou, S DasSarma, D J Des Marais, J L Eigenbrode, N Grefenstette, N L Lanza and 51 more

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Astrobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Rethinking nucleic acids from their origins to their applications.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Metabolomic Profile of the FungusFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Genome Sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

61 authors.

B L CarrierJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
D W BeatyJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
M A MeyerNASA Headquarters, Washington, DC, USA.
J G BlankNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.
L ChouGeorgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
S DasSarmaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
D J Des MaraisNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.
J L EigenbrodeNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.
N GrefenstetteSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
N L LanzaLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
A C SchuergerUniversity of Florida/Space Life Sciences Laboratory, Kennedy Space Center, Florida, USA.
P SchwendnerUniversity of Florida/Space Life Sciences Laboratory, Kennedy Space Center, Florida, USA.
H D SmithNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.
C R StokerNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.
J D TarnasBrown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
K D WebsterPlanetary Science Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
C BakermansPennsylvania State University, Altoona, Pennsylvania, USA.
B K BaxterWestminster College, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
M S BellNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
S A BennerFoundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, Alachua, Florida, USA.
H H Bolivar TorresUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Coyoacan, Distrito Federal Mexico, Mexico.
P J BostonNASA Astrobiology Institute, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.
R BrunerDenver Museum of Nature and Science, Denver, Colorado, USA.
B C ClarkSpace Science Institute, Littleton, Colorado, USA.
P DasSarmaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
A E EngelhartUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Z E GallegosUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Z K GarvinPrinceton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
P J GasdaLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
J H GreenTexas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
R L HarrisPrinceton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
M E HoffmanUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
T KieftNew Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico, USA.
A H D KoeppelNorthern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
P A LeeCollege of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
X LiUniversity of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
K L LynchLunar and Planetary Institute/USRA, Houston, Texas, USA.
R MackelprangCalifornia State University Northridge, Northridge, California, USA.
P R MahaffyNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.
L H MatthiesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
M A NellessenUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
H E NewsomUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
D E NorthupUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
B R W O'ConnorMcGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
S M PerlJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
R C QuinnNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.
L A RoweValparaiso University, Valparaiso, Indiana, USA.
B SautereyEcole Normale Superieure, Paris, France.
M A SchneegurtWichita State University, Wichita, Kansas, USA.
D Schulze-MakuchTechnische Universitat Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
L A ScuderiUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
M N SpildeUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
V StamenkovićJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
J A Torres CelisUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Coyoacan, Distrito Federal Mexico, Mexico.
D ViolaNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.
B D WadeMichigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
C J WalkerDelaware State University, Dover, Delaware, USA.
R C WiensLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
A J WilliamsUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
J M WilliamsUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
J XuUniversity of Texas, El Paso, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On November 5-8, 2019, the "Mars Extant Life: What's Next?" conference was convened in Carlsbad, New Mexico. The conference gathered a community of actively publishing experts in disciplines related to habitability and astrobiology. Primary conclusions are as follows: A significant subset of conference attendees concluded that there is a realistic possibility that Mars hosts indigenous microbial life. A powerful theme that permeated the conference is that the key to the search for martian extant life lies in identifying and exploring refugia ("oases"), where conditions are either permanently or episodically significantly more hospitable than average. Based on our existing knowledge of Mars, conference participants highlighted four potential martian refugium (not listed in priority order): Caves, Deep Subsurface, Ices, and Salts. The conference group did not attempt to reach a consensus prioritization of these candidate environments, but instead felt that a defensible prioritization would require a future competitive process. Within the context of these candidate environments, we identified a variety of geological search strategies that could narrow the search space. Additionally, we summarized a number of measurement techniques that could be used to detect evidence of extant life (if present). Again, it was not within the scope of the conference to prioritize these measurement techniques-that is best left for the competitive process. We specifically note that the number and sensitivity of detection methods that could be implemented if samples were returned to Earth greatly exceed the methodologies that could be used at Mars. Finally, important lessons to guide extant life search processes can be derived both from experiments carried out in terrestrial laboratories and analog field sites and from theoretical modeling.

Indexed as

ExobiologyExtraterrestrial EnvironmentMarsCavesComputer SimulationIceSpace FlightIceAstrobiologyBiosignaturesLife detectionLife in extreme environmentsMars extant life

Identifiers

PMID32466662
PMCPMC7307687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.