ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020
Comparative Analyses of Five Complete Chloroplast Genomes from the Genus
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed.
- New generic classification for Korean Peucedanum L. (Apiaceae) species based on deep phylogenomic study.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome and the Phylogenetic Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Comparative chloroplast genome analysis and phylogenomics of Nigerian Aframomum (Zingiberaceae): insights into chloroplast genome evolution and species divergence.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Cytotype classification and genetic diversity of Platostoma palustre revealed by rDNA localization and chloroplast genome.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetics of Chloroplasts Reveal Lower Rates of Genetic Variation in Mango (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes within Saxifraga sect. Ciliatae: insights into their adaptation to the alpine environment.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetic Analyses ofEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomes and phylogenetic analyses shed new insights on the phyloevolution of different ploidy in Camellia reticulata.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome and the Phylogenetic Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of confusingFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genomes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Comparative chloroplast genome analyses ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Dispersed repeats and inverted repeat expansion drive major plastomic rearrangements inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Comprehensive comparative analysis and development of molecular markers for Lasianthus species based on complete chloroplast genome sequences.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Plastome characterization and its phylogenetic implications on Lithocarpus (Fagaceae).BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis of six Malvaceae species based on chloroplast genomes.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Plastome Sequences of SevenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Phylogenomic analysis and dynamic evolution of chloroplast genomes of Clematis nannophylla.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomes of Dactylicapnos species: insights into phylogenetic relationships.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Exploring Plastomic Resources inGenes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.