Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32466549›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Strategies for Functional Interrogation of Big Cancer Data Using Drosophila Cancer Models.

Erdem Bangi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Drosophila as a Model for Metastasis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Epigenetic Regulation in Drosophila Tumor Models.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  3. In Silico Logical Modelling to Uncover Cooperative Interactions in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  4. Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  5. Basic and Translational Models of Cooperative Oncogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Erdem BangiDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.

Funding

Modeling the genetic complexity of colorectal cancer in DrosophilaR03CA219321 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BANGI, ERDEM · 2017 to 2018
$161k
NCI NIH HHS 1R03CA219321-01NCI NIH HHS R03 CA219321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid development of high throughput genome analysis technologies accompanied by significant reduction in costs has led to the accumulation of an incredible amount of data during the last decade. The emergence of big data has had a particularly significant impact in biomedical research by providing unprecedented, systems-level access to many disease states including cancer, and has created promising opportunities as well as new challenges. Arguably, the most significant challenge cancer research currently faces is finding effective ways to use big data to improve our understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying tumorigenesis and developing effective new therapies. Functional exploration of these datasets and testing predictions from computational approaches using experimental models to interrogate their biological relevance is a key step towards achieving this goal. Given the daunting scale and complexity of the big data available, experimental systems like Drosophila that allow large-scale functional studies and complex genetic manipulations in a rapid, cost-effective manner will be of particular importance for this purpose. Findings from these large-scale exploratory functional studies can then be used to formulate more specific hypotheses to be explored in mammalian models. Here, I will discuss several strategies for functional exploration of big cancer data using Drosophila cancer models.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBig DataDrosophilaGenomicsNeoplasmsbig datacancercancer genomicsDrosophila

Identifiers

PMID32466549
PMCPMC7312059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.