Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32466494›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Frequency of Pregnancy-Associated Cancer: A Systematic Review of Population-Based Studies.

Michela Dalmartello, Eva Negri, Carlo La Vecchia, Giovanna Scarfone, Barbara Buonomo, Fedro A Peccatori, Fabio Parazzini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Subsequent pregnancies after a diagnosis of pregnancy-associated cancer.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Breast cancer during pregnancy-The oncologist's point of view.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michela DalmartelloDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8764-9299
Eva NegriDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Carlo La VecchiaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1441-897X
Giovanna ScarfoneDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Barbara BuonomoFertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Fedro A PeccatoriFertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8227-8740
Fabio ParazziniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Funding

Progetto di rilevante interesse nazionale (PRIN) 2017728JPK_005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite numerous available resources of evidence, the results about the frequency of pregnancy-associated cancer (PAC) still show poor comparability due to dissimilarities in the study design and methodology, inclusion criteria, incoherent duration of follow-up and a heterogeneous reference population. We conducted a systematic review of population-based studies on PAC published up to December 2019, to provide updated research on this topic, highlighting strengths and limitations. Of the 24 papers included, 11 considered all types of tumors and 13 dealt with specific types of cancer. Differences in the procedures for estimating the frequency of PAC emerged even among population studies. However, we found consistent results for overall frequency of PAC- around 1/1000 pregnancies. Our review suggests that about 25% of PAC cases are diagnosed during pregnancy, confirming the hypothesis of an excess of diagnosis in the postpregnancy period. Sparse and inconsistent results were found regarding a potential increase in the frequency of PAC over calendar years. Alignments in the strategy to identify PAC are needed to overcome methodological weaknesses.

Indexed as

cancerfrequencypopulation-studypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32466494
PMCPMC7352408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.