Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32466435›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Aizheng Yang, Saqib Saleem Akhtar, Qiang Fu, Muhammad Naveed, Shahid Iqbal, Thomas Roitsch, Sven-Erik Jacobsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The potential of Paraburkholderia species to enhance crop growth.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Exopolysaccharide is required byFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Geoderma · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aizheng YangSchool of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Northeast Agriculture University, 150030 Harbin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9180-7974
Saqib Saleem AkhtarDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, DK-2630 Tåstrup, Denmark.
Qiang FuSchool of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Northeast Agriculture University, 150030 Harbin, China.
Muhammad NaveedInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-2759-6049
Shahid IqbalDepartment of Agronomy, Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture, 66000, Multan, Pakistan.
Thomas RoitschDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, DK-2630 Tåstrup, Denmark.
Sven-Erik JacobsenQuinoa Quality ApS, DK-4420 Regstrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9596-929X

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project 2018M641794Heilongjiang Provincial Postdoctoral Funding Project LBH-Z17008National Natural Science Foundation of China 51809041Northeast Agricultural University "Youth Talent" Fund Project 18QC30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the major challenges in agriculture is to ensure sufficient and healthy food availability for the increasing world population in near future. This requires maintaining sustainable cultivation of crop plants under varying environmental stresses. Among these stresses, salinity is the second most abundant threat worldwide after drought. One of the promising strategies to mitigate salinity stress is to cultivate halotolerant crops such as quinoa. Under high salinity, performance can be improved by plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB). Among PGPB, endophytic bacteria are considered better in stimulating plant growth compared to rhizosphere bacteria because of their ability to colonize both in plant rhizosphere and plant interior. Therefore, in the current study, a pot experiment was conducted in a controlled greenhouse to investigate the effects of endophytic bacteria i.e.,

Indexed as

Endophytic bacteriaPlant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB)

Identifiers

PMID32466435
PMCPMC7355930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.