Selection Response in a Divergent Selection Experiment for Birth Weight Variability in Mice Compared with a Control Line.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Inbreeding depression for litter size in two mice lines under divergent selection for environmental birth weight variability using genomic data.Journal of animal science · 2025
   Article
2. Genomic inbreeding measures applied to a population of mice divergently selected for birth weight environmental variance.Frontiers in genetics · 2023
   Article
3. Genetic parameters for uniformity of harvest weight in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei).Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as