Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32466108›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Intact Detection of Highly Occluded Immature Tomatoes on Plants Using Deep Learning Techniques.

Yue Mu, Tai-Shen Chen, Seishi Ninomiya, Wei Guo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yue MuPlant Phenomics Research Center, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, No. 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4679-6393
Tai-Shen ChenGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.
Seishi NinomiyaPlant Phenomics Research Center, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, No. 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2123-4354
Wei GuoInternational Field Phenomics Research Laboratory, Institute for Sustainable Agro-ecosystem Services, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Midori-cho, Nishi-Tokyo, Tokyo 188-0002, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3017-5464
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency CREST Program "Knowledge Discovery by Constructing AgriBigData" (JPMJCR1512)Japan Science and Technology Agency SICORP Program "Data Science-based Farming Support System for Sustainable Crop Production under Climatic Change"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic detection of intact tomatoes on plants is highly expected for low-cost and optimal management in tomato farming. Mature tomato detection has been wildly studied, while immature tomato detection, especially when occluded with leaves, is difficult to perform using traditional image analysis, which is more important for long-term yield prediction. Therefore, tomato detection that can generalize well in real tomato cultivation scenes and is robust to issues such as fruit occlusion and variable lighting conditions is highly desired. In this study, we build a tomato detection model to automatically detect intact green tomatoes regardless of occlusions or fruit growth stage using deep learning approaches. The tomato detection model used faster region-based convolutional neural network (R-CNN) with Resnet-101 and transfer learned from the Common Objects in Context (COCO) dataset. The detection on test dataset achieved high average precision of 87.83% (intersection over union ≥ 0.5) and showed a high accuracy of tomato counting (R

Indexed as

Deep LearningSolanum lycopersicumFruitImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computerdeep learningimage analysisprecision horticulturerobotic harvesting

Identifiers

PMID32466108
PMCPMC7288109
OpenAlexW3026754942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.