Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32466095›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

The Diagnostic Dilemma of Malignant Biliary Strictures.

Robert Dorrell, Swati Pawa, Yi Zhou, Neeraj Lalwani, Rishi Pawa

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06115655 (A Single-center, Prospective Cohort Study on the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Bile Duct Stenosis Based on Bile and Peripheral Blood cfDNA Methylation Profiles), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06115655 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Single-center, Prospective Cohort Study on the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Bile Duct Stenosis Based on Bile and Peripheral Blood cfDNA Methylation Profiles

TypeobservationalSponsorAir Force Military Medical University, ChinaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled161ConditionsBile Duct Neoplasms, Jaundice, Obstructive, Bile Duct DiseasesArmscfDNA methylation detection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert DorrellDepartment of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0796-9300
Swati PawaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Yi ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Neeraj LalwaniDepartment of Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5514-2805
Rishi PawaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differential diagnosis for biliary strictures is broad. However, the likelihood of malignancy is high. Determining the etiology of a biliary stricture requires a comprehensive physical exam, laboratory evaluation, imaging, and ultimately tissue acquisition. Even then, definitive diagnosis is elusive, and many strictures remain indeterminant in origin. This literary review examines the diagnostic dilemma of biliary strictures and presents innovations in both histochemical and endoscopic techniques that have increased the diagnostic power of differentiating benign and malignant strictures. The field of tissue biopsy is revolutionizing with the advent of free DNA mutation profiling, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and methionyl t-RNA synthetase 1 (MARS 1), which allow for greater testing sensitivity. Endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), cholangioscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy, and intraductal ultrasound build upon existing endoscopic technology to better characterize strictures that would otherwise be indeterminate in etiology. This review uses recent literature to insert innovative technology into the traditional framework of diagnostic methods for malignant biliary strictures.

Indexed as

cholangioscopyconfocal laser endomicroscopyendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyendoscopic ultrasoundfine-needle aspiration and biopsyhepatobiliary malignancyintraductal ultrasoundmalignant biliary stricturepancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID32466095
PMCPMC7277979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.