Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32464637›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy2020

The mechanistic overview of SARS-CoV-2 using angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 to enter the cell for replication: possible treatment options related to the renin-angiotensin system.

Annette Offringa, Roy Montijn, Sandeep Singh, Martin Paul, Yigal M Pinto, Sara-Joan Pinto-Sietsma

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Annette OffringaMicrobiology and System Biology, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Roy MontijnMicrobiology and System Biology, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Sandeep SinghVascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin PaulFaculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Yigal M PintoCardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sara-Joan Pinto-SietsmaVascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a healthcare crisis caused by insufficient knowledge applicable to effectively combat the virus. Therefore, different scientific discovery strategies need to be connected, to generate a rational treatment which can be made available as rapidly as possible. This relies on a solid theoretical understanding of the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and host responses, which is coupled to the practical experience of clinicians that are treating patients. Because SARS-CoV-2 enters the cell by binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), targeting ACE2 to prevent such binding seems an obvious strategy to combat infection. However, ACE2 performs its functions outside the cell and was found to enter the cell only by angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R)-induced endocytosis, after which ACE2 is destroyed. This means that preventing uptake of ACE2 into the cell by blocking AT1R would be a more logical approach to limit entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the cell. Since ACE2 plays an important protective role in maintaining key biological processes, treatments should not disrupt the functional capacity of ACE2, to counterbalance the negative effects of the infection. Based on known mechanisms and knowledge of the characteristics of SARS-CoV we propose the hypothesis that the immune system facilitates SARS-CoV-2 replication which disrupts immune regulatory mechanisms. The proposed mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 causes disease immediately suggests a possible treatment, since the AT1R is a key player in this whole process. AT1R antagonists appear to be the ideal candidate for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. AT1R antagonists counterbalance the negative consequences of angiotesnin II and, in addition, they might even be involved in preventing the cellular uptake of the virus without interfering with ACE2 function. AT1R antagonists are widely available, cheap, and safe. Therefore, we propose to consider using AT1R antagonists in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

Angiotensin IIAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAnimalsAntiviral AgentsBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentEndocytosisHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansPandemicsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase APneumonia, ViralRenin-Angiotensin SystemSARS-CoV-2ACE protein, humanAngiotensin IIAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntiviral AgentsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AAngiotensin-converting enzyme 2Angiotensin receptor blockersCoronavirusCOVID-19Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system

Identifiers

PMID32464637
PMCPMC7314063
OpenAlexW3031053977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.